Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33422036›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Comparative analysis of clinical factors associated with pedicle screw pull-out during or immediately after surgery between intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and postoperative computed tomography.

Satoshi Sumiya, Kazuyuki Fukushima, Yoshiro Kurosa, Takashi Hirai, Hiroyuki Inose, Toshitaka Yoshii, Atsushi Okawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Automated multi-objective pedicle screw planning.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satoshi SumiyaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, 3400-28 Nakagomi, 385-0051, Saku City, Nagano, Japan. sumiya.orth.7077@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-9860
Kazuyuki FukushimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, 3400-28 Nakagomi, 385-0051, Saku City, Nagano, Japan.
Yoshiro KurosaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, 3400-28 Nakagomi, 385-0051, Saku City, Nagano, Japan.
Takashi HiraiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki InoseDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshitaka YoshiiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi OkawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, 3400-28 Nakagomi, 385-0051, Saku City, Nagano, Japan.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JPSaku Central Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo studies to date have elucidated the clinical factors associated with pedicle screw pull-out during or immediately after surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of pedicle screw pull-out by comparing intraoperative scans obtained using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with postoperative scans obtained using computed tomography (CT). We also sought to determine the incidence of pedicle screw pull-out and identify relevant risk factors.

methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 742 pedicle screws placed in 76 consecutive patients who underwent at least triple-level posterior fixation for thoracic or lumbar spinal injury, spinal metastasis, or pyogenic spondylitis between April 2014 and July 2020. Pedicle screw pull-out distance in the axial and sagittal planes was compared between CT scans obtained 2 days postoperatively and CBCT images acquired intraoperatively. Risk factors associated with pedicle screw pull-out were investigated by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

resultsPedicle screw pull-out was seen with 58 pedicle screws (7.8%) in 26 patients (34.2%). There were significant differences in age, number of fused segments, frequency of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), and medical history of osteoporosis for pedicle screw pull-out. Risk factors for pedicle screw pull-out were older age (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.130) and a diagnosis of DISH (odds ratio 3.35, 95% confidence interval 1.12-10.00). Several cases suggest that use of connecting rods was an important factor in intraoperative pedicle screw pull-out.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that age, number of fused segments, presence of DISH, and medical history of osteoporosis are risk factors for pedicle screw pull-out, with the greatest being older age and DISH.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsSpinal FusionAgedCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansLumbar VertebraeRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT)Connecting rodDiffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH)Pedicle screw pull‐out

Identifiers

PMID33422036
PMCPMC7797098
OpenAlexW3120232936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.