Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33422025›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design.

Willem-Jan Metsemakers, Kirsten Kortram, Nando Ferreira, Mario Morgenstern, Alexander Joeris, Hans-Christoph Pape, Christian Kammerlander, Sanjit Konda, Jong-Keon Oh, Peter V Giannoudis and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03598530 (Fracture-Related Outcome Study for Operatively Treated Tibia Shaft Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03598530 active not recruitingnot on this map

Fracture-Related Outcome Study for Operatively Treated Tibia Shaft Fractures (FROST)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAO Clinical Investigation and Publishing DocumentationRan2019 to 2025Enrolled1,000ConditionsTibial Fracture, Fracture of the Tibia Type AO/OTA 42ArmsSurgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Willem-Jan MetsemakersDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. willem-jan.metsemakers@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4114-9093
Kirsten KortramTrauma Research Unit, Department of Trauma Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nando FerreiraDivision of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mario MorgensternDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexander JoerisAO Innovation Translation Center, AO Foundation, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Hans-Christoph PapeDepartment of Trauma, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian KammerlanderDepartment of General Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sanjit KondaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital and Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jong-Keon OhDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Guro Hospital, Guro-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Peter V GiannoudisAcademic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Kenneth A EgolDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
William T ObremskeyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Michael H J VerhofstadTrauma Research Unit, Department of Trauma Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael RaschkeDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
F.R.O.S.T. Study Group
Erasmus MC · NLLeeds General Infirmary · GBStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Zurich · CHAO Foundation · CHKorea University Medical Center · KRKU Leuven · BELMU Klinikum · DENew York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital · USUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTibial shaft fractures (TSFs) are among the most common long bone injuries often resulting from high-energy trauma. To date, musculoskeletal complications such as fracture-related infection (FRI) and compromised fracture healing following fracture fixation of these injuries are still prevalent. The relatively high complication rates prove that, despite advances in modern fracture care, the management of TSFs remains a challenge even in the hands of experienced surgeons. Therefore, the Fracture-Related Outcome Study for operatively treated Tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.) aims at creating a registry that enables data mining to gather detailed information to support future clinical decision-making regarding the management of TSF's.

methodsThis prospective, international, multicenter, observational registry for TSFs was recently developed. Recruitment started in 2019 and is planned to take 36 months, seeking to enroll a minimum of 1000 patients. The study protocol does not influence the clinical decision-making procedure, implant choice, or surgical/imaging techniques; these are being performed as per local hospital standard of care. Data collected in this registry include injury specifics, treatment details, clinical outcomes (e.g., FRI), patient-reported outcomes, and procedure- or implant-related adverse events. The minimum follow up is 12 months. DISCUSSION: Although over the past decades, multiple high-quality studies have addressed individual research questions related to the outcome of TSFs, knowledge gaps remain. The scarcity of data calls for an international high-quality, population-based registry. Creating such a database could optimize strategies intended to prevent severe musculoskeletal complications. The main purpose of the F.R.O.S.T registry is to evaluate the association between different treatment strategies and patient outcomes. It will address not only operative techniques and implant materials but also perioperative preventive measures. For the first time, data concerning systemic perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, the influence of local antimicrobials, and timing of soft-tissue coverage will be collected at an international level and correlated with standardized outcome measures in a large prospective, multicenter, observational registry for global accessibility.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03598530 .

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryTibial FracturesFracture HealingHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesRegistriesTibiaTreatment OutcomeComplicationsFractureFracture fixationFracture-related infectionInfectionNonunionRegistryTibial shaft fracture

Identifiers

PMID33422025
PMCPMC7797092
OpenAlexW3118782188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.