Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33421856›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2021

Recall bias during adolescence: Gender differences and associations with depressive symptoms.

Jessica K Bone, Gemma Lewis, Jonathan P Roiser, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, Glyn Lewis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Social working memory in adolescence.Child development · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Social feedback biases emerge during recall but not prediction and shift across the development of social anxiety.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica K BoneDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: jessica.bone@ucl.ac.uk.
Gemma LewisDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Jonathan P RoiserInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah-Jayne BlakemoreInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Glyn LewisDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBThe London College · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 104908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a sharp increase in depression in females in mid-adolescence, but we do not understand why. Cognitive theories suggest that people with depression have negative biases in recalling self-referential information. We tested whether recall biases were more negative in girls in early and mid-adolescence and were associated with depressive symptoms.

methods315 young and 263 mid-adolescents (11-12 and 13-15 years) completed a surprise test, assessing recall of social evaluation about the self (self-referential) or another person (other-referential). The short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire measured depressive symptoms. We tested the effects of condition (self-referential/other-referential), valence (positive/negative), gender, and age group on correct recall (hits) and associations with depressive symptoms.

resultsThere was no evidence for gender or age differences in positive or negative self-referential recall. Self-referential positive hits were negatively associated with depressive symptoms (adjusted coefficient=-0.38, 95% CI=-0.69-0.08, p=0.01). Self-referential negative hits were positively associated with depressive symptoms (adjusted coefficient=0.45, 95% CI=0.15-0.75, p=0.003), and this association was stronger in females (adjusted interaction p=0.04). LIMITATIONS: The reliability and validity of the recall task are unknown. We cannot provide evidence of a causal effect of recall on depressive symptoms in this cross-sectional study.

conclusionsAdolescents who recalled more self-referential negative and fewer self-referential positive words had more severe depressive symptoms. Females did not demonstrate more recall biases, but the association between self-referential negative hits and depressive symptoms was stronger in females. Negative self-referential recall may be a risk factor for depressive symptoms and is a good candidate for longitudinal studies.

Indexed as

DepressionSex CharacteristicsAdolescentBiasCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsAdolescenceCognitionDepressionGender differenceMemoryRecall bias

Identifiers

PMID33421856
PMCPMC7615279
OpenAlexW3116738949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.