Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33421415›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Generalizing HMMs to Continuous Time for Fast Kinetics: Hidden Markov Jump Processes.

Zeliha Kilic, Ioannis Sgouralis, Steve Pressé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Single-Photon Single-Particle Tracking.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mamba time series forecasting with uncertainty quantification.Machine learning: science and technology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Physics-Inspired Single-Particle Tracking Accelerated with Parallelism.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Single-molecule reaction-diffusion.Biophysical journal · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Increasing the accuracy of single-molecule data analysis using tMAVEN.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Single-Molecule Reaction-Diffusion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zeliha KilicCenter for Biological Physics, Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Ioannis SgouralisDepartment of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Steve PresséCenter for Biological Physics, Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. Electronic address: spresse@asu.edu.

Funding

A Bayesian nonparametric approach to superresolved tracking of multiple molecules inside living cellsR01GM130745 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
Theoretical Models of Single Molecule Dynamics from Minimal Photon NumbersR01GM134426 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2022
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130745NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hidden Markov model (HMM) is a framework for time series analysis widely applied to single-molecule experiments. Although initially developed for applications outside the natural sciences, the HMM has traditionally been used to interpret signals generated by physical systems, such as single molecules, evolving in a discrete state space observed at discrete time levels dictated by the data acquisition rate. Within the HMM framework, transitions between states are modeled as occurring at the end of each data acquisition period and are described using transition probabilities. Yet, whereas measurements are often performed at discrete time levels in the natural sciences, physical systems evolve in continuous time according to transition rates. It then follows that the modeling assumptions underlying the HMM are justified if the transition rates of a physical process from state to state are small as compared to the data acquisition rate. In other words, HMMs apply to slow kinetics. The problem is, because the transition rates are unknown in principle, it is unclear, a priori, whether the HMM applies to a particular system. For this reason, we must generalize HMMs for physical systems, such as single molecules, because these switch between discrete states in "continuous time". We do so by exploiting recent mathematical tools developed in the context of inferring Markov jump processes and propose the hidden Markov jump process. We explicitly show in what limit the hidden Markov jump process reduces to the HMM. Resolving the discrete time discrepancy of the HMM has clear implications: we no longer need to assume that processes, such as molecular events, must occur on timescales slower than data acquisition and can learn transition rates even if these are on the same timescale or otherwise exceed data acquisition rates.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsKineticsMarkov ChainsProbability

Identifiers

PMID33421415
PMCPMC7896036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.