Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33421253›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

Comparison of

Maria Fala, Vencel Somai, Andreas Dannhorn, Gregory Hamm, Katherine Gibson, Dominique-Laurent Couturier, Richard Hesketh, Alan J Wright, Zoltan Takats, Josephine Bunch and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Potential Clinical Applications of HyperpolarizedRecent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Hyperpolarized Carbon-13 MRI in Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Comparison ofMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria FalaCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Vencel SomaiCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Andreas DannhornImaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1087-4057
Gregory HammImaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Katherine GibsonImaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Dominique-Laurent CouturierCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Richard HeskethCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alan J WrightCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Zoltan TakatsDepartment of Digestion, Metabolism and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, London, United Kingdom.
Josephine BunchNational Centre of Excellence in Mass Spectrometry Imaging (NiCE-MSI), National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom.
Simon T BarryBioscience, Discovery, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Richard J A GoodwinImaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kevin M BrindleCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3883-6287
University of Cambridge · GBAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBImperial College London · GBNational Physical Laboratory · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17242Cancer Research UK 28289Cancer Research UK A25040Cancer Research UK A25177Cancer Research UK A28289Cancer Research UK A28397Cancer Research UK A29580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare carbon-13 (

methods[1-

results[1-

conclusionThe inhomogeneous distribution of labeled lactate observed in the MRS images was confirmed by MS imaging of the corresponding tumor sections. The images acquired using both techniques show that the rate of

Indexed as

LymphomaPyruvic AcidAnimalsCarbon IsotopesLactic AcidMagnetic Resonance ImagingMass SpectrometryMiceCarbon IsotopesLactic AcidPyruvic Acidhyperpolarized 13C MRIlactatemass spectrometry imagingpyruvatetumor

Identifiers

PMID33421253
PMCPMC7986146
OpenAlexW3121112485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.