Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33421132›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2021

A blueprint for gene function analysis through Base Editing in the model plant Physcomitrium (Physcomitrella) patens.

Anouchka Guyon-Debast, Alessandro Alboresi, Zoé Terret, Florence Charlot, Floriane Berthier, Pol Vendrell-Mir, Josep M Casacuberta, Florian Veillet, Tomas Morosinotto, Jean-Luc Gallois and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What can hornworts teach us?Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  7. Biotechnological Advances to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anouchka Guyon-DebastInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, 78000, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3489-1035
Alessandro AlboresiDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, 35121, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4818-7778
Zoé TerretINRAE, GAFL, Montfavet, 84143, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8057-755X
Florence CharlotInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, 78000, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1218-951X
Floriane BerthierInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, 78000, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3368-8078
Pol Vendrell-MirCentre for Research in Agricultural Genomics CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB, Edifici CRAG, Bellaterra, Barcelona, 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5695-5880
Josep M CasacubertaCentre for Research in Agricultural Genomics CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB, Edifici CRAG, Bellaterra, Barcelona, 08193, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5609-4152
Florian VeilletIGEPP, INRAE, Institut Agro, Université de Rennes, Ploudaniel, 29260, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6892-6825
Tomas MorosinottoDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, 35121, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0803-7591
Jean-Luc GalloisINRAE, GAFL, Montfavet, 84143, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0451-1740
Fabien NoguéInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, 78000, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0619-4638
AgroParisTech · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRCenter for Research in Agricultural Genomics · ESUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 has proven to be highly valuable for genome editing in plants, including the model plant Physcomitrium patens. However, the fact that most of the editing events produced using the native Cas9 nuclease correspond to small insertions and deletions is a limitation. CRISPR-Cas9 base editors enable targeted mutation of single nucleotides in eukaryotic genomes and therefore overcome this limitation. Here, we report two programmable base-editing systems to induce precise cytosine or adenine conversions in P. patens. Using cytosine or adenine base editors, site-specific single-base mutations can be achieved with an efficiency up to 55%, without off-target mutations. Using the APT gene as a reporter of editing, we could show that both base editors can be used in simplex or multiplex, allowing for the production of protein variants with multiple amino-acid changes. Finally, we set up a co-editing selection system, named selecting modification of APRT to report gene targeting (SMART), allowing up to 90% efficiency site-specific base editing in P. patens. These two base editors will facilitate gene functional analysis in P. patens, allowing for site-specific editing of a given base through single sgRNA base editing or for in planta evolution of a given gene through the production of randomly mutagenised variants using multiple sgRNA base editing.

Indexed as

BryopsidaClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingMutagenesis, Site-Directedadenine deaminaseAPRTbase editingCas9CRISPRcytosine deaminasePhyscomitrella patensPhyscomitrium patens

Identifiers

PMID33421132
PMCPMC8048939
OpenAlexW3118767471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.