Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33421079›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2020

The healthy food marketing strategies study: design, baseline characteristics, and supermarket compliance.

Karen Glanz, Annie Chung, Knashawn H Morales, Pui L Kwong, Douglas Wiebe, Donna Paulhamus Giordano, Colleen M Brensinger, Allison Karpyn

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karen GlanzPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Annie ChungPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Knashawn H MoralesPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pui L KwongPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Douglas WiebePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Donna Paulhamus GiordanoPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Colleen M BrensingerPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Allison KarpynCenter for Research in Education and Social Policy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.

Funding

The Impact of Healthy Food Marketing Strategies In SupermarketsR01DK101629 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GLANZ, KAREN · 2014 to 2017
$2.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK101629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying effective strategies to promote healthy eating and reduce obesity is a priority in the USA, especially among low-income and minority groups, who often have less access to healthy food and higher rates of obesity. Efforts to improve food access have led to more supermarkets in low-income, ethnically diverse neighborhoods. However, this alone may not be enough to reduce food insecurity and improve residents' diet quality and health. This paper summarizes the design, methods, baseline findings, and supermarket in-store marketing strategy compliance for a randomized trial of the impact of healthy food marketing on the purchase of healthier "target" food items. Thirty-three supermarkets in low-income, high-minority neighborhoods in the metropolitan Philadelphia area were matched on store size and percentage of sales from government food assistance programs and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Healthy marketing strategies, including increased availability of healthier "target" products, prime shelf-placement and call-out promotion signs, and reduced availability of regular "comparison" products, were implemented in 16 intervention stores for an 18 month period for over 100 individual food items. Six product categories were studied: bread, checkout cooler beverages, cheese, frozen dinners, milk, and salty snacks. The primary outcome measure was weekly sales per store in each product category for 1 year preintervention and 18 months during the intervention. Compliance with the marketing strategies was assessed twice per month for the first 6 months and once a month thereafter. Store and neighborhood characteristics were not significantly different between control and intervention stores. Intercept surveys with customers to assess shopping habits and grocery marketing environment assessments to examine the food promotion environment were completed in the same six food categories. In intercept surveys, 51.0% of shoppers self-identified as overweight and 60.6% wanted to change their weight. Shoppers who typically purchased one type of food over another commonly did so out of habit or because the item was on sale. Findings revealed that preintervention sales of healthier "target" or regular "comparison" items did not differ between intervention and control stores for 1 year prior to intervention implementation. Rates of compliance with the healthy marketing strategies were high, averaging 76.5% over the first 12 months in all 16 stores. If healthy in-store marketing interventions are effective in this scaled-up, longer-term study, they should be translated into wider use in community supermarkets.

Indexed as

Food MarketsFood SupplyConsumer BehaviorDietHumansMarketingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFood environmentFood insecurityFood shoppingHealthy food marketingObesity

Identifiers

PMID33421079
PMCPMC7796717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.