Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33421074›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2021

Psychometric Assessment of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale for People With Lower-Limb Amputation.

Matthew J Miller, Meredith L Mealer, Paul F Cook, Andrew J Kittelson, Cory L Christiansen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J MillerDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Meredith L MealerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Paul F CookCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Andrew J KittelsonSchool of Physical Therapy, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
Cory L ChristiansenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Montana · USVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System · US

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN GERIATRIC MEDICINET32AG000212 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Alexander Keliimoeanu Smith · 1991 to 2026
$7.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to (1) determine the psychometric properties of the 25- and 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scales (CD-RISC25, CD-RISC10) for people with lower-limb amputation (LLA) in middle age or later, and (2) describe relationships of the CD-RISC with biopsychosocial, sociodemographic, and health variables.

methodsParticipants were included if their most recent LLA was 1 or more years prior, if they were independently walking with a prosthesis, and if they were between 45 and 88 years of age (N = 122; mean = 62.5 years of age [SD = 8]; 59.5 [mean = 58] months since LLA; 88.5% male; 82.0% with dysvascular etiology; 68.0% with unilateral transtibial LLA). Psychometric analyses included assessment of skewness, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, and agreement between versions. Correlation analyses were used to determine associations between the CD-RISC with disability, perceived functional capacity, falls efficacy, life-space, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, social support, sociodemographic, and health variables. Additionally, quartiles of participants were identified using CD-RISC25 and CD-RISC10 scores and compared using ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons for disability, perceived functional capacity, falls efficacy, and life-space.

resultsSkewness, floor, and ceiling effects of both CD-RISC versions were acceptable. Both versions of the CD-RISC were internally consistent (CD-RISC25: α = .92; CD-RISC10: α = .89). The CD-RISC25 and CD-RISC10 were highly correlated with disability, perceived functional capacity, falls efficacy, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy (r = 0.52-0.67). CD-RISC25 and CD-RISC10 quartile differences, especially the lowest quartile, were identified for disability, perceived functional capacity, falls efficacy, and life-space.

conclusionThe CD-RISC25 and CD-RISC10 have acceptable psychometric properties for use with people who have LLA. CD-RISC scores are associated with clinically relevant biopsychosocial measures targeted by physical therapist intervention following LLA. IMPACT: The CD-RISC may be an appropriate tool to measure resilience following LLA.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overAmputeesCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationExerciseFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsRecovery of FunctionReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCopingLower Extremity AmputationPsychometricsPsychosocialResilience

Identifiers

PMID33421074
PMCPMC8023555
OpenAlexW3120629822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.