Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33421073›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2021

In vitro activity of the novel antifungal olorofim against dermatophytes and opportunistic moulds including Penicillium and Talaromyces species.

Ashutosh Singh, Prerna Singh, Jacques F Meis, Anuradha Chowdhary

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Emergence ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dematiaceous Molds.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  9. MycoKeys · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Amphotericin B in the Era of New Antifungals: Where Will It Stand?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashutosh SinghDepartment of Medical Mycology, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Prerna SinghDepartment of Medical Mycology, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Jacques F MeisDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital (CWZ), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anuradha ChowdharyDepartment of Medical Mycology, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
University of Delhi · INRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOlorofim is a novel antifungal agent with in vitro activity against Aspergillus and other opportunistic moulds. We investigated the in vitro activity of olorofim against a range of filamentous fungi comprising isolates of Aspergillus species, Scedosporium species, Alternaria alternata, dermatophytes, including terbinafine- and multidrug-resistant Trichophyton species, and Penicillium/Talaromyces species originating from patients in North India.

methodsAntifungal susceptibility of olorofim was tested against 241 mould isolates of Penicillium/Talaromyces species, Trichophyton species, A. fumigatus and cryptic Aspergillus species, Scedosporium species, and Alternaria alternata using CLSI broth microdilution. The comparators were five systemic azoles, amphotericin B, terbinafine, and luliconazole.

resultsOverall, olorofim showed highly potent in vitro activity against dermatophytes and opportunistic moulds (MIC range of 0.004-0.125 mg/L) except for Alternaria alternata. Penicillium, and Talaromyces species and Trichophyton species exhibited a low geometric mean (GM) MIC (GM 0.027 mg/L and 0.015 mg/L, respectively) of olorofim. Importantly, a 2-12 dilution step decrease in in vitro activity of olorofim as compared with azoles was observed against Penicillium and Talaromyces. Notably, olorofim displayed potent in vitro activity against Trichophyton isolates including terbinafine-resistant and azole-resistant Trichophyton mentagrophytes/interdigitale with a modal MIC value of 0.008 mg/L. Further, azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolates harbouring mutations in azole target Cyp51A genes and several cryptic aspergilli displayed low MICs (range 0.004-0.03 mg/L) of olorofim. However, no in vitro activity of olorofim against Alternaria alternata was observed.

conclusionsThe potent in vitro activity of olorofim against drug-resistant dermatophytes and opportunistic moulds is promising, warranting evaluation of the clinical utility of olorofim.

Indexed as

ArthrodermataceaePenicilliumTalaromycesAcetamidesAlternariaAntifungal AgentsHumansIndiaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPiperazinesPyrimidinesPyrrolesAcetamidesAntifungal AgentsolorofimPiperazinesPyrimidinesPyrroles

Identifiers

PMID33421073
PMCPMC8050765
OpenAlexW3118485437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.