Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33421052›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2021

Healthy ageing for all? Comparisons of socioeconomic inequalities in health expectancies over two decades in the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies I and II.

Holly Q Bennett, Andrew Kingston, Gemma Spiers, Louise Robinson, Lynne Corner, Clare Bambra, Carol Brayne, Fiona E Matthews, Carol Jagger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Synaptic resilience is associated with maintained cognition during ageing.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Holly Q BennettPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Andrew KingstonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Gemma SpiersPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Louise RobinsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Lynne CornerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Clare BambraPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Carol BrayneDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Fiona E MatthewsPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Carol JaggerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of Health PR-PRU-1217-21502Medical Research Council G0601022Medical Research Council G9901400Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1Medical Research Council MR/P012299/1The Dunhill Medical Trust RPGF1806/44
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing life expectancy (LE), cross-sectional data show widening inequalities in disability-free LE (DFLE) by socioeconomic status (SES) in many countries. We use longitudinal data to better understand trends in DFLE and years independent (IndLE) by SES, and how underlying transitions contribute.

methodsThe Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS I and II) are large population-based studies of those aged ≥65 years in three English centres (Newcastle, Nottingham, Cambridgeshire), with baseline around 1991 (CFAS I, n = 7635) and 2011 (CFAS II, n = 7762) and 2-year follow-up. We defined disability as difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL), dependency by combining ADLs and cognition reflecting care required, and SES by area-level deprivation. Transitions between disability or dependency states and death were estimated from multistate models.

resultsBetween 1991 and 2011, gains in DFLE at age 65 were greatest for the most advantaged men and women [men: 4.7 years, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.3-6.2; women: 2.8 years, 95% CI 1.3-4.3]. Gains were due to the most advantaged women having a reduced risk of incident disability [relative risk ratio (RRR):0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.8], whereas the most advantaged men had a greater likelihood of recovery (RRR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.2) and reduced disability-free mortality risk (RRR: 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.6]. Risk of death from disability decreased for least advantaged men (RRR: 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9); least advantaged women showed little improvement in transitions. IndLE patterns across time were similar.

conclusionsPrevention should target the most disadvantaged areas, to narrow inequalities, with clear indication from the most advantaged that reduction in poor transitions is achievable.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingPersons with DisabilitiesActivities of Daily LivingAgedCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLife ExpectancyMaleSocial Classdependencydeprivationdisabilityhealth expectancyLife expectancysocial class

Identifiers

PMID33421052
PMCPMC8271204
OpenAlexW3119455793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.