Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420842›Full record

Observational studyEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendation for future resource utilisation.

Aleix Rovira, Stephen Tricklebank, Pavol Surda, Stephen Whebell, Joe Zhang, Arun Takhar, Elizabeth Yeung, Kathleen Fan, Imran Ahmed, Phillip Hopkins and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic review and meta-analysis of tracheostomy outcomes in COVID-19 patients.The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Tracheostomy for COVID-19: evolving best practice.Critical care (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. How to prevent hypoxia during surgical and percutaneous tracheostomies in COVID-19 patients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  19. Response to comments to "Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendationfor future resource utilisation".European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aleix Rovira *Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK. aleix.rovira@gstt.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8736-4963
Stephen TricklebankDepartment of Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Pavol SurdaDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Stephen WhebellDepartment of Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Joe ZhangDepartment of Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Arun TakharDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Elizabeth YeungDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kathleen FanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Imran AhmedDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Phillip HopkinsDepartment of Critical Care, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Deborah DawsonDepartment of Critical Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jonathan BallDepartment of Critical Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ram KumarDepartment of Critical Care, Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Waqas KhaliqDepartment of Critical Care, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ricard SimoDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Asit AroraDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBKingston Hospital · GBLewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic placed an unprecedented demand on critical care services for the provision of mechanical ventilation. Tracheostomy formation facilitates liberation from mechanical ventilation with advantages for both the patient and wider critical care resource, and can be performed using both percutaneous dilatational and surgical techniques. We compared outcomes in those patients undergoing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy to those undergoing surgical tracheostomy and make recommendations for provision of tracheostomy services in any future surge.

methodsMulticentre multidisciplinary retrospective observational cohort study including 201 patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis admitted to an ICU in one of five NHS Trusts within the South London Adult Critical Care Network who required mechanical ventilation and subsequent tracheostomy.

resultsPercutaneous dilatational tracheostomy was performed in 124 (62%) of patients, and surgical tracheostomy in 77 (38%) of patients. There was no difference between percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and surgical tracheostomy in either the rate of peri-operative complications (16.9 vs. 22.1%, p = 0.46), median [IQR(range)] time to decannulation [19.0 (15.0-30.2 (5.0-65.0)] vs. 21.0 [15.5-36.0 (5.0-70.0) days] or mortality (13.7% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.84). Of the 172 patients that were alive at follow-up, two remained ventilated and 163 were decannulated.

conclusionIn patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis that require tracheostomy to facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation, there was no difference in outcomes between those patients that had percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy compared with those that had surgical tracheostomy. Planning for future surges in COVID-19-related critical care demands should utilise all available resource and expertise.

Indexed as

COVID-19TracheostomyAdultHumansLondonPandemicsRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Covid-19Mechanical ventilationPercutaneous tracheostomySurgical tracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID33420842
PMCPMC7796696
OpenAlexW3120919623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.