Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420711›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2021

Immediate online use of prosody reveals the ironic intentions of a speaker: neurophysiological evidence.

Maël Mauchand, Jonathan A Caballero, Xiaoming Jiang, Marc D Pell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maël MauchandSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 2001, McGill College, Montréal, Quebec, H3A1G1, Canada. mael.mauchand@mail.mcgill.ca.
Jonathan A CaballeroSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 2001, McGill College, Montréal, Quebec, H3A1G1, Canada.
Xiaoming JiangInstitute of Linguistics, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China.
Marc D PellSchool of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 2001, McGill College, Montréal, Quebec, H3A1G1, Canada.
McGill University · CAInstitute of Linguistics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In social interactions, speakers often use their tone of voice ("prosody") to communicate their interpersonal stance to pragmatically mark an ironic intention (e.g., sarcasm). The neurocognitive effects of prosody as listeners process ironic statements in real time are still poorly understood. In this study, 30 participants judged the friendliness of literal and ironic criticisms and compliments in the absence of context while their electrical brain activity was recorded. Event-related potentials reflecting the uptake of prosodic information were tracked at two time points in the utterance. Prosody robustly modulated P200 and late positivity amplitudes from utterance onset. These early neural responses registered both the speaker's stance (positive/negative) and their intention (literal/ironic). At a later timepoint (You are such a great/horrible cook), P200, N400, and P600 amplitudes were all greater when the critical word valence was congruent with the speaker's vocal stance, suggesting that irony was contextually facilitated by early effects from prosody. Our results exemplify that rapid uptake of salient prosodic features allows listeners to make online predictions about the speaker's ironic intent. This process can constrain their representation of an utterance to uncover nonliteral meanings without violating contextual expectations held about the speaker, as described by parallel-constraint satisfaction models.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionVoiceComprehensionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansIntentionMaleERPsIronyNonliteral meaningsSpeech communicationVocal expression

Identifiers

PMID33420711
OpenAlexW3119903987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.