Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420674›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2021

What is the best long-term treatment modality for immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis?

A Wikström, M Brundin, M F Lopes, M El Sayed, G Tsilingaridis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pulp Therapies Rooted in Evidence: IAPD Porto Declaration.International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Successful retreatment of a maxillary central incisor with a wide-open apex using MTA to fill the entire canal: 24-year follow-up.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A WikströmDivision of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden. alina.wikstrom@sll.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8281-9241
M BrundinDepartment of Endodontics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8747-3307
M F LopesCentre of Paediatric Oral Health, Stockholm, Sweden.
M El SayedDivision of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
G TsilingaridisDivision of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-5840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate and assess the current knowledge about apexification and regenerative techniques as a meaningful treatment modality and to map the scientific evidence for the efficacy of both methods for the management of traumatised immature teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis.

methodsThis systematic review searched five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid (Medline), and Embase. Published articles written in English were considered for inclusion. The following keywords were used: Regenerative endodontic treatment OR regenerat* OR revital* OR endodontic regeneration OR regenerative endodontics OR pulp revascularization OR revasculari* OR 'traumatized immature teeth'. Only peer-reviewed studies with a study size of at least 20 cases followed up for 24 months were included. Eligibility assessment was performed independently in a blinded manner by three reviewers and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Subgroup analyses were performed on three clinical outcomes: survival, success, and continued root development.

resultsSeven full texts out of 1359 citations were included and conventional content analysis was performed. Most of the identified citations were case reports and case series.

conclusionsIn the present systematic review, the qualitative analysis revealed that both regenerative and apexification techniques had equal rates of success and survival and proved to be effective in the treatment of immature necrotic permanent teeth. Endodontic regenerative techniques appear to be superior to apexification techniques in terms of stimulation of root maturation, i.e. root wall thickening and root lengthening. Knowledge gaps were identified regarding the treatment and follow-up protocols for both techniques.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp NecrosisPeriapical PeriodontitisApexificationDental PulpDentition, PermanentHumansRoot Canal TherapyChildrenImmature teethOpen apicesPulp necrosisPulp regenerationRegenerative endodontics

Identifiers

PMID33420674
PMCPMC8213569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.