Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420664›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2021

Conservative Therapy for Peyronie's Disease: a Contemporary Review of the Literature.

Ayad Yousif, Caleb Natale, Wayne J G Hellstrom

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Current treatment concepts for Peyronie's disease].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayad YousifDepartment of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave. 86-42, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Caleb NataleDepartment of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave. 86-42, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Wayne J G HellstromDepartment of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave. 86-42, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. whellst@tulane.edu.
Tulane University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo analyze the literature on current conservative treatment options for Peyronie's disease (PD). RECENT

findingsConservative therapy with intralesional collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) is safe and efficacious in either the acute or chronic phases of PD. Combination treatment with penile traction therapy (PTT) can produce even better results. While most PTT devices require extended periods of therapy up to 8 h per day, the RestoreX® device can be effective at 30-90 min per day. A variety of conservative therapies are available for treatment of PD. The available literature does not reveal any treatment benefit of oral therapies. Intralesional therapy is the mainstay conservative treatment of PD. Intralesional CCH therapy is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved intralesional therapy and represents the authors' preference for medical therapy. The most effective conservative management of PD likely requires a combination of therapies.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentAcute DiseaseChronic DiseaseCombined Modality TherapyHumansInjections, IntralesionalMaleMicrobial CollagenasePenile IndurationTractionUrological AgentsMicrobial CollagenaseUrological AgentsConservative therapyIntralesional therapyMechanical therapyOral therapyPeyronie’s disease

Identifiers

PMID33420664
OpenAlexW3120176609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.