ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2021
Timing of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation affects the spermatogenic recovery outcome in mice.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simultaneous Co-transplantation for Highly Efficient Cell Therapy.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Progress in germline stem cell transplantation in mammals and the potential usage.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Spermatogonial stem cell transplantation (SSCT) is a strategy that has demonstrated to be feasible to restore spermatogenesis in animal models when it is performed shortly after the gonadotoxic onset to destroy their endogenous germ cells. However, in the case of boys subjected to fertility preservation, future transplantations will be performed with a delay of many years. In order to study how timing of SSCT affects donor-derived spermatogenic recovery in mice, we compared the percentage of spermatogenic tubule cross-sections within testes of 59 C57BL/6NCrl mice distributed in 6 groups: group 1, untreated mice controls (n = 9); group 2, mice that received a single dose of busulfan 40 mg/kg (n = 10); group 3, mice that received two additional doses of busulfan 10 mg/kg every 5 weeks (n = 10); group 4 (SSCT-A), mice subjected to a standard SSCT performed 5 weeks after a single injection of busulfan 40 mg/kg (n = 10); group 5 (SSCT-B), mice subjected to a delayed SSCT performed 15 weeks after a single injection of busulfan 40 mg/kg (n = 10); and group 6 (SSCT-C), mice subjected to a delayed SSCT with two additional doses of busulfan 10 mg/kg every 5 weeks (n = 10). Spermatogenic recovery in standard SSCT-A and SSCT-C groups ranged between 22.29 and 22.65%, compared with a lower recovery rate of 11.54% showed in the SSCT-B group. However, donor contribution resulted higher in standard SSCT-A, representing a 69.71% of cross-sections, compared with the rest of conditions ranging from 34.69 to 35.42%. Overall, we concluded that a delay in the SSCT from the gonadotoxic onset decreases the efficiency of donor-derived spermatogenic recovery in mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.