Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420579›Full record

ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2021

Timing of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation affects the spermatogenic recovery outcome in mice.

J V Medrano, I Acimovic, A Navarro-Gomezlechon, I Noguera, A Pellicer, M M Andrés, E Novella-Maestre

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Simultaneous Co-transplantation for Highly Efficient Cell Therapy.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

J V MedranoUnidad de Medicina Reproductiva, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Av. Fernando Abril Martorell, 106. Torre A, Lab. 6.22, 46026, Valencia, Spain. jomepla@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-1375
I AcimovicDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic.
A Navarro-GomezlechonUnidad de Medicina Reproductiva, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Av. Fernando Abril Martorell, 106. Torre A, Lab. 6.22, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
I NogueraAnimal Facility, Faculty of Pharmacy, Valencia University, 46015, Valencia, Spain.
A PellicerUnidad de Medicina Reproductiva, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Av. Fernando Abril Martorell, 106. Torre A, Lab. 6.22, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
M M AndrésHospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
E Novella-MaestreUnidad de Medicina Reproductiva, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Av. Fernando Abril Martorell, 106. Torre A, Lab. 6.22, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe · ESMasaryk University · CZUniversitat de València · ESValencian Infertility Institute · ES

Funding

Celtic Submarí club- Villareal C.F. Private donationInstituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/00931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spermatogonial stem cell transplantation (SSCT) is a strategy that has demonstrated to be feasible to restore spermatogenesis in animal models when it is performed shortly after the gonadotoxic onset to destroy their endogenous germ cells. However, in the case of boys subjected to fertility preservation, future transplantations will be performed with a delay of many years. In order to study how timing of SSCT affects donor-derived spermatogenic recovery in mice, we compared the percentage of spermatogenic tubule cross-sections within testes of 59 C57BL/6NCrl mice distributed in 6 groups: group 1, untreated mice controls (n = 9); group 2, mice that received a single dose of busulfan 40 mg/kg (n = 10); group 3, mice that received two additional doses of busulfan 10 mg/kg every 5 weeks (n = 10); group 4 (SSCT-A), mice subjected to a standard SSCT performed 5 weeks after a single injection of busulfan 40 mg/kg (n = 10); group 5 (SSCT-B), mice subjected to a delayed SSCT performed 15 weeks after a single injection of busulfan 40 mg/kg (n = 10); and group 6 (SSCT-C), mice subjected to a delayed SSCT with two additional doses of busulfan 10 mg/kg every 5 weeks (n = 10). Spermatogenic recovery in standard SSCT-A and SSCT-C groups ranged between 22.29 and 22.65%, compared with a lower recovery rate of 11.54% showed in the SSCT-B group. However, donor contribution resulted higher in standard SSCT-A, representing a 69.71% of cross-sections, compared with the rest of conditions ranging from 34.69 to 35.42%. Overall, we concluded that a delay in the SSCT from the gonadotoxic onset decreases the efficiency of donor-derived spermatogenic recovery in mice.

Indexed as

SpermatogenesisStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsBusulfanMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, BiologicalSpermatogoniaSpermatozoaStem CellsSterilizationTime FactorsBusulfanFertility preservationGonadotoxic onsetSpermatogenic recoverySpermatogonial stem cell transplantationTiming

Identifiers

PMID33420579
OpenAlexW3119837774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.