Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420547›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2021

Bioengineering Approaches for Placental Research.

Mackenzie L Wheeler, Michelle L Oyen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Nutraceuticals in Pregnancy: A Special Focus on Probiotics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Evaluation of gelatin bloom strength on gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel properties.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mackenzie L WheelerDepartment of Engineering, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Michelle L OyenDepartment of Engineering, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA. oyenm18@ecu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3428-748X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research into the human placenta's complex functioning is complicated by a lack of suitable physiological in vivo models. Two complementary approaches have emerged recently to address these gaps in understanding, computational in silico techniques, including multi-scale modeling of placental blood flow and oxygen transport, and cellular in vitro approaches, including organoids, tissue engineering, and organ-on-a-chip models. Following a brief introduction to the placenta's structure and function and its influence on the substantial clinical problem of preterm birth, these different bioengineering approaches are reviewed. The cellular techniques allow for investigation of early first-trimester implantation and placental development, including critical biological processes such as trophoblast invasion and trophoblast fusion, that are otherwise very difficult to study. Similarly, computational models of the placenta and the pregnant pelvis at later-term gestation allow for investigations relevant to complications that occur when the placenta has fully developed. To fully understand clinical conditions associated with the placenta, including those with roots in early processes but that only manifest clinically at full-term, a holistic approach to the study of this fascinating, temporary but critical organ is required.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlacentaTissue EngineeringFemaleHumansPregnancyBiomimeticComputational modelsFinite elementsHydrogelsMicrofluidicsOrganoidsTissue engineeringTrophoblast

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.