ReviewJapanese journal of ophthalmology2021
Practical use of multiplex and broad-range PCR in ophthalmology.
Review in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- FilmArray® multiplex PCR panels on corneal swabs in suspected infectious keratitis: a pragmatic real-world study.International ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- The Use of CSF Multiplex PCR Panel in Patients with Viral Uveitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Application of Metagenomic Long-Read Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Herpetic Uveitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for microbiological diagnosis of infectious uveitis.Journal of medical microbiology · 2024Article
- Role of Recent PCR Tests for Infectious Ocular Diseases: From Laboratory-Based Studies to the Clinic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Advances in the microbiological diagnosis of herpetic retinitis.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2022Review
- Emerging diagnostic modalities in microbial keratitis: Beyond culture and smear.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPolymerase chain reaction (PCR) can be used to confirm or deny infectious ocular inflammation such as uveitis. The purpose of this article is to review the current practical use of PCR examination in ophthalmology, especially multiplex and broad-range PCR, and a novel PCR, termed Strip PCR. At first, in the Introduction, we show the development of the PCR examination in ophthalmology. We next show the clinical applications of multiplex PCR and broad-range PCR. These advances in PCR continue to contribute greatly to the ophthalmology field. We also show how the sample for PCR is collected. Recently, we established a novel examination, a multiplex real-time PCR (Strip PCR) prototype for detecting 24 pathogens responsible for ocular infectious diseases. Moreover, we developed the Direct Strip PCR method, which skips the DNA extraction step in the procedure. This PCR is anticipated to ease etiologic evaluation, increasing pathogen detection in the intraocular fluids of uveitis patients even by general ophthalmologists. We also describe the following: (1) representative cases in which PCR is useful, (2) representative cases in which PCR can exclude a diagnosis, (3) the current status of PCR in the diagnosis of infectious uveitis and advanced medical service, and (4) the prospects for clinical PCR in ophthalmology.
conclusionWe have established and developed the multiplex PCR, broad-range PCR, Strip PCR, and Direct Strip PCR methods and have reported the efficacy of such tests in multicenter studies. Our goal is "rapid and simple comprehensive PCR diagnosis anywhere and by anyone" for ocular infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.