ArticleScientific reports2021
Response of bacterial and fungal communities to high petroleum pollution in different soils.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence for Reductions in Fungal Richness and Beta Diversity Dispersion Associated With Impervious Surfaces in California.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Molecular Monitoring in Soil Bioremediation: From Genetic Potential to Verified Pathway Operation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Asphaltene biodegradation and transcriptome responses of hydrocarbon degradation genes in soil by a novel tolerant fungal consortium.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Enhanced Diclofenac Biodegradation by Bacterial Strains and a Microbial Consortium from Activated Sludge: Toxicity Assessment and Insights into Microbial Community Dynamics.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
- Biosynthesis ofRSC advances · 2026Article
- Diagnosing soil bioremediation failure: evidence-weighted pathways from mechanism to field closure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Oil mineral aggregates engineered from bio-synthesized calcite nanoparticles for improved crude oil biodegradation.Biodegradation · 2025Article
- Microbiota structure shift under varying organic loading rates and their impact on polyhydroxyalkanoate production in wastewater treatment plants.Biodegradation · 2025Article
- Regulation of the Microbiome in Soil Contaminated with Diesel Oil and Gasoline.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Crude-oil degradation capabilities by microscopic fungi of deep-sea hydrothermal vents.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025Article
- Promoting the remediation of contaminated soils using biochar in combination with bioaugmentation and phytoremediation techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact assessment of differential chlormequat chloride exposure on soil fungal community dynamics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of mixed-species forest plantations on soil mycobiota community structure and diversity in the Congolese coastal plains.PloS one · 2024Article
- Soil Microbiome in Conditions of Oil Pollution of Subarctic Ecosystems.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Main Factors Determining the Scale-Up Effectiveness of Mycoremediation for the Decontamination of Aliphatic Hydrocarbons in Soil.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- The Analysis of the Mycobiota in Plastic Polluted Soil Reveals a Reduction in Metabolic Ability.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Phytomanagement of a Lead-Polluted Shooting Range Using an Aromatic Plant Species and Its Effects on the Rhizosphere Bacterial Diversity and Essential Oil Production.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Study on the Changes in Immobilized Petroleum-Degrading Bacteria Beads in a Continuous Bioreactor Related to Physicochemical Performance, Degradation Ability, and Microbial Community.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Petroleum pollution of soils is a major environmental problem. Soil microorganisms can decompose a significant fraction of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil at low concentrations (1-5%). This characteristic can be used for soil remediation after oil pollution. Microbial community dynamics and functions are well studied in cases of moderate petroleum pollution, while cases with heavy soil pollution have received much less attention. We studied bacterial and fungal successions in three different soils with high petroleum contents (6 and 25%) in a laboratory experiment. The proportion of aliphatic and aromatic compounds decreased by 4-7% in samples with 6% pollution after 120 days of incubation but remained unchanged in samples with 25% hydrocarbons. The composition of the microbial community changed significantly in all cases. Oil pollution led to an increase in the relative abundance of bacteria such as Actinobacteria and the candidate TM7 phylum (Saccaribacteria) and to a decrease in that of Bacteroidetes. The gene abundance (number of OTUs) of oil-degrading bacteria (Rhodococcus sp., candidate class TM7-3 representative) became dominant in all soil samples, irrespective of the petroleum pollution level and soil type. The fungal communities in unpolluted soil samples differed more significantly than the bacterial communities. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling revealed that in the polluted soil, successions of fungal communities differed between soils, in contrast to bacterial communities. However, these successions showed similar trends: fungi capable of lignin and cellulose decomposition, e.g., from the genera Fusarium and Mortierella, were dominant during the incubation period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.