Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420265›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A novel simple risk model to predict the prognosis of patients with paraquat poisoning.

Yanxia Gao, Liwen Liu, Tiegang Li, Ding Yuan, Yibo Wang, Zhigao Xu, Linlin Hou, Yan Zhang, Guoyu Duan, Changhua Sun and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yanxia GaoEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Liwen LiuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Tiegang LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, China.
Ding YuanEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Yibo WangEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Zhigao XuEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Linlin HouEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Yan ZhangEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Guoyu DuanEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Changhua SunEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Lu CheEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Sujuan LiEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Pei SunEmergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Yi LiEmergency Department, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China. billliyi@126.com.
Zhigang RenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China. fccrenzg@zzu.edu.cn.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNChina Medical University · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify risk factors and develop a simple model to predict early prognosis of acute paraquat (PQ) poisoning patients, we performed a retrospective cohort study of acute PQ poisoning patients (n = 1199). Patients (n = 913) with PQ poisoning from 2011 to 2018 were randomly divided into training (n = 609) and test (n = 304) samples. Another two independent cohorts were used as validation samples for a different time (n = 207) and site (n = 79). Risk factors were identified using a logistic model with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation and further evaluated using a latent class analysis. The prediction score was developed based on the training sample and was evaluated using the testing and validation samples. Eight factors, including age, ingestion volume, creatine kinase-MB [CK-MB], platelet [PLT], white blood cell [WBC], neutrophil counts [N], gamma-glutamyl transferase [GGT], and serum creatinine [Cr] were identified as independent risk indicators of in-hospital death events. The risk model had C statistics of 0.895 (95% CI 0.855-0.928), 0.891 (95% CI 0.848-0.932), and 0.829 (95% CI 0.455-1.000), and predictive ranges of 4.6-98.2%, 2.3-94.9%, and 0-12.5% for the test, validation_time, and validation_site samples, respectively. In the training sample, the risk model classified 18.4%, 59.9%, and 21.7% of patients into the high-, average-, and low-risk groups, with corresponding probabilities of 0.985, 0.365, and 0.03 for in-hospital death events. We developed and evaluated a simple risk model to predict the prognosis of patients with acute PQ poisoning. This risk scoring system could be helpful for identifying high-risk patients and reducing mortality due to PQ poisoning.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMortalityParaquatPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentParaquat

Identifiers

PMID33420265
PMCPMC7794476
OpenAlexW3119062790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.