ArticleScientific reports2021
Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes indicated different origin for Indian tea (Camellia assamica cv TV1) as compared to Chinese tea.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assembly and comparative analysis of the first complete mitochondrial genome of Camellia sinensis var. assamica 'Hainan Dayezhong', endemic to Hainan Province, China.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the multi-rings mitochondrial genome of Populus tomentosa.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Analysis of chloroplast genome characteristics and codon usage bias in 14 species of Annonaceae.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Article
- Genetic analyses of ancient tea trees provide insights into the breeding history and dissemination of Chinese Assam tea (Plant diversity · 2024Article
- Comparative Phylogenetic Analysis of Ancient Korean Tea "Hadong Cheon-Nyeon Cha (Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Application of Multi-Perspectives in Tea Breeding and the Main Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Comparative analysis of codon usage patterns in chloroplast genomes of ten Epimedium species.BMC genomic data · 2023Article
- Comparative phylogenetic analysis of oolong tea (Heliyon · 2022Article
- Tea and tea drinking: China's outstanding contributions to the mankind.Chinese medicine · 2022Review
- Comparative Analysis of Codon Bias in the Chloroplast Genomes of Theaceae Species.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- United States tea: A synopsis of ongoing tea research and solutions to United States tea production issues.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- From the Wild to the Cup: Tracking Footprints of the Tea Species in Time and Space.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Based upon the morphological characteristics, tea is classified botanically into 2 main types i.e. Assam and China, which are morphologically very distinct. Further, they are so easily pollinated among themselves, that a third category, Cambod type is also described. Although the general consensus of origin of tea is India, Burma and China adjoining area, yet specific origin of China and Assam type tea are not yet clear. Thus, we made an attempt to understand the origin of Indian tea through the comparative analysis of different chloroplast (cp) genomes under the Camellia genus by performing evolutionary study and comparing simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and codon usage distribution patterns among them. The Cp genome based phylogenetic analysis indicated that Indian Tea, TV1 formed a different group from that of China tea, indicating that TV1 might have undergone different domestications and hence owe different origins. The simple sequence repeats (SSRs) analysis and codon usage distribution patterns also supported the clustering order in the cp genome based phylogenetic tree.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.