Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420221›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Contribution to unravel variability in bowhead whale songs and better understand its ecological significance.

F Erbs, M van der Schaar, J Weissenberger, S Zaugg, M André

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

F ErbsLaboratory of Applied Bioacoustics, Technical University of Catalonia, BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
M van der SchaarLaboratory of Applied Bioacoustics, Technical University of Catalonia, BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
J WeissenbergerFT SST ERO, Equinor ASA, Oslo, Norway.
S ZauggLaboratory of Applied Bioacoustics, Technical University of Catalonia, BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
M AndréLaboratory of Applied Bioacoustics, Technical University of Catalonia, BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain. michel.andre@upc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first studies on bowhead whale singing behaviour, song variations have been consistently reported. However, there has been little discussion regarding variability in bowhead whale singing display and its ecological significance. Unlike the better studied humpback whales, bowhead whales do not appear to share songs at population level, but several studies have reported song sharing within clusters of animals. Over the winter season 2013-2014, in an unstudied wintering ground off Northeast Greenland, 13 song groups sharing similar hierarchical structure and units were identified. Unit types were assessed through multidimensional maps, showing well separated clusters corresponding to manually labelled units, and revealing the presence of unit subtypes. Units presented contrasting levels of variability over their acoustic parameters, suggesting that bowhead whales keep consistency in some units while using a continuum in values of frequency, duration and modulation parameters for other unit types. Those findings emphasise the need to account for variability in song analysis to better understand the behavioural ecology of this endangered species. Additionally, shifting from song toward units or phrase-based analysis, as it has been suggested for humpback whales, offers the opportunity to identify and track similarities in songs over temporal and geographical scales relevant to population monitoring.

Indexed as

Bowhead WhaleEcological and Environmental PhenomenaVocalization, AnimalAnimalsSeasons

Identifiers

PMID33420221
PMCPMC7794550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.