Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420153›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Factors associated with measles resurgence in the United States in the post-elimination era.

Christian Akem Dimala, Benjamin Momo Kadia, Miriam Aiwokeh Mbong Nji, Ndemazie Nkafu Bechem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christian Akem DimalaDepartment of Medicine, Reading Hospital, Tower Health System, West Reading, PA, USA.
Benjamin Momo KadiaDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. benjaminmomokadia@gmail.com.
Miriam Aiwokeh Mbong NjiDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ndemazie Nkafu BechemCollege of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Emory University · USFlorida Agricultural and Mechanical University · USLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBReading Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been growing concerns of a potential re-establishment of measles transmission in the United States (US) in the years to come. This study aims to explore potential factors underlying the resurgence of measles in the US by objectively assessing the associations between annual incidence rates (AIR), case importation, vaccination status and disease outbreaks. Data on measles transmission between January 1st, 2001 and December 31st, 2019 were obtained from the national centres for disease control and prevention (CDC) surveillance databases and other published reports. Changes in incidence rates over time were assessed by binomial regression models. Of the 3874 cases of measles in the US over the study period, 3506 (90.5%, 95% CI: 89.5-91.4) occurred in US residents. The AIR per million population in US residents over this period was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.59-0.61), with an overall significant increase over time (p = 0.011). The median percentage of imported and vaccinated cases were 36% [17.9-46.6] and 15% [12.1-23.2] respectively. There was a significant decrease in the percentage of imported cases (p < 0.001) but not of vaccinated cases (p = 0.159) over time. There was a moderate and weak negative correlation between the AIR and the percentage of imported and vaccinated cases respectively (r = -0.59 and r = -0.27 respectively). On multiple linear regression there was a significant linear association between the AIR and the number of outbreaks (p = 0.003) but not with the percentage of imported cases (p = 0.436) and vaccinated cases (p = 0.692), R

Indexed as

Disease EradicationDisease OutbreaksHumansIncidenceMeaslesMeasles VaccineRisk FactorsUnited StatesMeasles Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID33420153
PMCPMC7794463
OpenAlexW3120002919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.