Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420120›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A common protocol for the simultaneous processing of multiple clinically relevant bacterial species for whole genome sequencing.

Kathy E Raven, Sophia T Girgis, Asha Akram, Beth Blane, Danielle Leek, Nicholas Brown, Sharon J Peacock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  2. Whole Genome Analyses Accurately IdentifyInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathy E RavenDepartment of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 157, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Sophia T GirgisDepartment of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 157, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Asha AkramDepartment of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 157, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Beth BlaneDepartment of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 157, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Danielle LeekDepartment of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 157, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Nicholas BrownClinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Public Health England, Cambridge, UK.
Sharon J PeacockDepartment of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Box 157, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. sjp97@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing is likely to become increasingly used by local clinical microbiology laboratories, where sequencing volume is low compared with national reference laboratories. Here, we describe a universal protocol for simultaneous DNA extraction and sequencing of numerous different bacterial species, allowing mixed species sequence runs to meet variable laboratory demand. We assembled test panels representing 20 clinically relevant bacterial species. The DNA extraction process used the QIAamp mini DNA kit, to which different combinations of reagents were added. Thereafter, a common protocol was used for library preparation and sequencing. The addition of lysostaphin, lysozyme or buffer ATL (a tissue lysis buffer) alone did not produce sufficient DNA for library preparation across the species tested. By contrast, lysozyme plus lysostaphin produced sufficient DNA across all 20 species. DNA from 15 of 20 species could be extracted from a 24-h culture plate, while the remainder required 48-72 h. The process demonstrated 100% reproducibility. Sequencing of the resulting DNA was used to recapitulate previous findings for species, outbreak detection, antimicrobial resistance gene detection and capsular type. This single protocol for simultaneous processing and sequencing of multiple bacterial species supports low volume and rapid turnaround time by local clinical microbiology laboratories.

Indexed as

BacteriaDNA, BacterialGenome, BacterialHumansTime FactorsWhole Genome SequencingDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID33420120
PMCPMC7794230
OpenAlexW3118747064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.