ArticleScientific reports2021
Hydrogen-methane breath testing results influenced by oral hygiene.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methanogens: vital but threatened members of the human microbiome?Trends in microbiology · 2026Review
- Hydrogen and Methane Breath Test: The Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association Monograph.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Review
- Small intestinal microbiome, the underrated maestro of SIMO disease.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- A real-world assessment of healthcare resource utilization following IBS-SmartFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Delayed orocecal transit in pediatric gut-brain interaction disorders: A comparative study using the lactulose breath test.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025Article
- Fullerene-decorated PdCo nano-resistor network hydrogen sensors with sub-second response and parts-per-billion detection at room temperature.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Gas-tly Interpretations: A Case-Based Approach to the Nuances of SIBO Breath Testing.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Investigating the association between the symptoms of women with Fibromyalgia, Digestive function, and markers of the microbiota of the Gastrointestinal Tract (The FIDGIT Study): study protocol.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Modification of baseline status to improve breath tests performance.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Response to Erdrich S et al.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Article
- Re: European guideline on indications, performance, and clinical impact of hydrogen and methane breath tests in adult and pediatric patients.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Article
- Impact of Exercise on Gut Microbiota in Obesity.Nutrients · 2021Review
- A Promising Approach: Artificial Intelligence Applied to Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) Diagnosis Using Cluster Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The measurement of hydrogen-methane breath gases is widely used in gastroenterology to evaluate malabsorption syndromes and bacterial overgrowth. Laboratories offering breath testing provide variable guidance regarding oral hygiene practices prior to testing. Given that oral dysbiosis has the potential to cause changes in breath gases, it raises concerns that oral hygiene is not a standard inclusion in current breath testing guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine how a pre-test mouthwash may impact hydrogen-methane breath test results. Participants presenting for breath testing who had elevated baseline gases were given a chlorhexidine mouthwash. If a substantial reduction in expired hydrogen or methane occurred after the mouthwash, breath samples were collected before and after a mouthwash at all breath sample collection points for the duration of testing. Data were evaluated to determine how the mouthwash might influence test results and diagnostic status. In 388 consecutive hydrogen-methane breath tests, modifiable elevations occurred in 24.7%. Administration of a chlorhexidine mouthwash resulted in significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced breath hydrogen in 67% and/or methane gas in 93% of those consenting to inclusion. In some cases, this modified the diagnosis. Mean total gas concentrations pre- and post-mouthwash were 221.0 ppm and 152.1 ppm (p < 0.0001) for hydrogen, and 368.9 ppm and 249.8 ppm (p < 0.0001) for methane. Data suggest that a single mouthwash at baseline has a high probability of returning a false positive diagnosis. Variations in gas production due to oral hygiene practices has significant impacts on test interpretation and the subsequent diagnosis. The role of oral dysbiosis in causing gastrointestinal symptoms also demands exploration as it may be an underlying factor in the presenting condition that was the basis for the referral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.