Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420116›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Hydrogen-methane breath testing results influenced by oral hygiene.

Sharon Erdrich, Edwin C K Tan, Jason A Hawrelak, Stephen P Myers, Joanna E Harnett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. A real-world assessment of healthcare resource utilization following IBS-SmartFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Response to Erdrich S et al.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon ErdrichFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. Sharon.erdrich@sydney.edu.au.
Edwin C K TanFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Jason A HawrelakSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 26, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.
Stephen P MyersNatMed-Research Unit, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW, 2480, Australia.
Joanna E HarnettFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUSouthern Cross University · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The measurement of hydrogen-methane breath gases is widely used in gastroenterology to evaluate malabsorption syndromes and bacterial overgrowth. Laboratories offering breath testing provide variable guidance regarding oral hygiene practices prior to testing. Given that oral dysbiosis has the potential to cause changes in breath gases, it raises concerns that oral hygiene is not a standard inclusion in current breath testing guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine how a pre-test mouthwash may impact hydrogen-methane breath test results. Participants presenting for breath testing who had elevated baseline gases were given a chlorhexidine mouthwash. If a substantial reduction in expired hydrogen or methane occurred after the mouthwash, breath samples were collected before and after a mouthwash at all breath sample collection points for the duration of testing. Data were evaluated to determine how the mouthwash might influence test results and diagnostic status. In 388 consecutive hydrogen-methane breath tests, modifiable elevations occurred in 24.7%. Administration of a chlorhexidine mouthwash resulted in significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced breath hydrogen in 67% and/or methane gas in 93% of those consenting to inclusion. In some cases, this modified the diagnosis. Mean total gas concentrations pre- and post-mouthwash were 221.0 ppm and 152.1 ppm (p < 0.0001) for hydrogen, and 368.9 ppm and 249.8 ppm (p < 0.0001) for methane. Data suggest that a single mouthwash at baseline has a high probability of returning a false positive diagnosis. Variations in gas production due to oral hygiene practices has significant impacts on test interpretation and the subsequent diagnosis. The role of oral dysbiosis in causing gastrointestinal symptoms also demands exploration as it may be an underlying factor in the presenting condition that was the basis for the referral.

Indexed as

Oral HygieneAdolescentAdultAgedBreath TestsDysbiosisExhalationFemaleGasesGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansHydrogenMalabsorption SyndromesMaleMethaneMiddle AgedGasesHydrogenMethaneMouthwashes

Identifiers

PMID33420116
PMCPMC7794545
OpenAlexW3120092437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.