Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33420095›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2021

A single vaccination with four-segmented rift valley fever virus prevents vertical transmission of the wild-type virus in pregnant ewes.

Paul J Wichgers Schreur, Judith Oymans, Jet Kant, Sandra van de Water, Anna Kollár, Yves Dehon, Pál Soós, Zoltán Pénzes, Lucien van Keulen, Jeroen Kortekaas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul J Wichgers SchreurDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University and Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands. paul.wichgersschreur@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-2438
Judith OymansDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University and Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Jet KantDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University and Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Sandra van de WaterDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University and Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Anna KollárCeva Animal Health, Ceva-Phylaxia, Budapest, Hungary.
Yves DehonCeva Animal Health, Ceva-Phylaxia, Budapest, Hungary.
Pál SoósCeva Animal Health, Ceva-Phylaxia, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán PénzesCeva Animal Health, Ceva-Phylaxia, Budapest, Hungary.
Lucien van KeulenDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University and Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Jeroen KortekaasDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University and Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0329-0176
Wageningen University & Research · NLTeva Pharmaceuticals (Hungary) · HUNetherlands Leprosy Relief · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is a mosquito-transmitted bunyavirus that causes severe outbreaks among wild and domesticated ruminants, of which sheep are the most susceptible. Outbreaks are characterised by high mortality rates among new-born lambs and abortion storms, in which all pregnant ewes in a flock may abort their foetuses. In endemic areas, Rift Valley fever (RVF) can be controlled by vaccination with either inactivated or live-attenuated vaccines. Inactivated vaccines are safe for animals during all physiological stages, including pregnancy. However, optimal efficacy of these vaccines depends on multiple vaccinations and yearly re-vaccination. Live-attenuated vaccines are generally highly efficacious after a single vaccination, but currently available live-attenuated vaccines may transmit to the ovine foetus, resulting in stillbirths, congenital malformations or abortion. We have previously reported the development of a novel live-attenuated RVFV vaccine, named RVFV-4s. This vaccine virus was created by splitting the M genome segment and deleting the major virulence determinant NSs, and was shown to be safe even for the most susceptible species, including pregnant ewes. The demonstrated efficacy and safety profile suggests that RVFV-4s holds promise for veterinary and human application. The RVFV-4s vaccine for veterinary application, here referred to as vRVFV-4s, was shown to provide complete protection after a single vaccination of lambs, goats and cattle. In this work, we evaluated the efficacy of the vRVFV-4s vaccine in pregnant ewes. Anticipating on the extremely high susceptibility of pregnant ewes for RVFV, both a single vaccination and double vaccination were evaluated in two independent experiments. The combined results suggest that a single vaccination with vRVFV-4s is sufficient to protect pregnant ewes and to prevent transmission to the ovine foetus.

Identifiers

PMID33420095
PMCPMC7794363
OpenAlexW3119911979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.