Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419862›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Using Head-Mounted Ethanol Sensors to Monitor Olfactory Information and Determine Behavioral Changes Associated with Ethanol-Plume Contact during Mouse Odor-Guided Navigation.

Mohammad F Tariq, Suzanne M Lewis, Aliena Lowell, Sidney Moore, Jesse T Miles, David J Perkel, David H Gire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad F TariqGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195.ORCID 0000-0001-6962-1452
Suzanne M LewisDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195.
Aliena LowellDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195.
Sidney MooreDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195.
Jesse T MilesGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195.
David J PerkelDepartments of Biology and Otolaryngology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195.ORCID 0000-0002-3142-9614
David H GireDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 dhgire@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4119-4270

Funding

Auditory Neuroscience Traning ProgramT32DC005361 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Adrian KC Lee, DAVID J PERKEL · 2002 to 2026
$8.8M
Evidence accumulation across large-scale cortical networks during odor tracking by freely moving miceR21DC018649 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GIRE, DAVID HENRY, STEINMETZ, NICHOLAS · 2020 to 2021
$410k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC018649NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC005361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfaction guides navigation and decision-making in organisms from multiple animal phyla. Understanding how animals use olfactory cues to guide navigation is a complicated problem for two main reasons. First, the sensory cues used to guide animals to the source of an odor consist of volatile molecules, which form plumes. These plumes are governed by turbulent air currents, resulting in an intermittent and spatiotemporally varying olfactory signal. A second problem is that the technologies for chemical quantification are cumbersome and cannot be used to detect what the freely moving animal senses in real time. Understanding how the olfactory system guides this behavior requires knowing the sensory cues and the accompanying brain signals during navigation. Here, we present a method for real-time monitoring of olfactory information using low-cost, lightweight sensors that robustly detect common solvent molecules, like alcohols, and can be easily mounted on the heads of freely behaving mice engaged in odor-guided navigation. To establish the accuracy and temporal response properties of these sensors we compared their responses with those of a photoionization detector (PID) to precisely controlled ethanol stimuli. Ethanol-sensor recordings, deconvolved using a difference-of-exponentials kernel, showed robust correlations with the PID signal at behaviorally relevant time, frequency, and spatial scales. Additionally, calcium imaging of odor responses from the olfactory bulbs (OBs) of awake, head-fixed mice showed strong correlations with ethanol plume contacts detected by these sensors. Finally, freely behaving mice engaged in odor-guided navigation showed robust behavioral changes such as speed reduction that corresponded to ethanol plume contacts.

Indexed as

SmellSpatial NavigationAnimalsCuesEthanolMiceOdorantsEthanolbehaviorforagingnavigationolfactionsensory

Identifiers

PMID33419862
PMCPMC7877453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.