Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419861›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Neural Correlates of Vocal Auditory Feedback Processing: Unique Insights from Electrocorticography Recordings in a Human Cochlear Implant User.

Charles A Miller, Roozbeh Behroozmand, Christine P Etler, Kirill V Nourski, Richard A Reale, Hiroyuki Oya, Hiroto Kawasaki, Jeremy D W Greenlee

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charles A MillerHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242 IA.
Roozbeh BehroozmandSpeech Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, 29208 SC.
Christine P EtlerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242 IA.
Kirill V NourskiHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242 IA.ORCID 0000-0002-7152-8473
Richard A RealeHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242 IA.
Hiroyuki OyaHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242 IA.ORCID 0000-0002-1733-5478
Hiroto KawasakiHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242 IA.ORCID 0000-0002-7688-9171
Jeremy D W GreenleeHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242 IA jeremy-greenlee@uiowa.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8481-8517
University of Iowa · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

HUMAN AUDITORY CORTEX PHYSIOLOGYR01DC004290 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HOWARD, MATTHEW A. · 2000 to 2025
$13.7M
Neural mechanisms of vocal communication in the human brainR01DC015260 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI GREENLEE, JEREMY · 2016 to 2021
$2.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004290NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is considerable interest in understanding cortical processing and the function of top-down and bottom-up human neural circuits that control speech production. Research efforts to investigate these circuits are aided by analysis of spectro-temporal response characteristics of neural activity recorded by electrocorticography (ECoG). Further, cortical processing may be altered in the case of hearing-impaired cochlear implant (CI) users, as electric excitation of the auditory nerve creates a markedly different neural code for speech compared with that of the functionally intact hearing system. Studies of cortical activity in CI users typically record scalp potentials and are hampered by stimulus artifact contamination and by spatiotemporal filtering imposed by the skull. We present a unique case of a CI user who required direct recordings from the cortical surface using subdural electrodes implanted for epilepsy assessment. Using experimental conditions where the subject vocalized in the presence (CIs ON) or absence (CIs OFF) of auditory feedback, or listened to playback of self-vocalizations without production, we observed ECoG activity primarily in γ (32-70 Hz) and high γ (70-150 Hz) bands at focal regions on the lateral surface of the superior temporal gyrus (STG). High γ band responses differed in their amplitudes across conditions and cortical sites, possibly reflecting different rates of stimulus presentation and differing levels of neural adaptation. STG γ responses to playback and vocalization with auditory feedback were not different from responses to vocalization without feedback, indicating this activity reflects not only auditory, but also attentional, efference-copy, and sensorimotor processing during speech production.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionElectrocorticographyFeedbackHumansSpeechepilepsy surgeryhearing lossspeech production

Identifiers

PMID33419861
PMCPMC7877459
OpenAlexW3118506658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.