Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419469›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

A platform trial in practice: adding a new experimental research arm to the ongoing confirmatory FLAIR trial in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Dena R Howard, Anna Hockaday, Julia M Brown, Walter M Gregory, Susan Todd, Tahla Munir, Jamie B Oughton, Claire Dimbleby, Peter Hillmen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dena R HowardLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. dena.howard@roche.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3333-9783
Anna HockadayLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Julia M BrownLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Walter M GregoryLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Susan ToddDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Tahla MunirSt James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Jamie B OughtonLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Claire DimblebyLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Peter HillmenSt James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25447Cancer Research UK C18027/A15790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe FLAIR trial in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia has a randomised, controlled, open-label, confirmatory, platform design. FLAIR was successfully amended to include an emerging promising experimental therapy to expedite its assessment, greatly reducing the time to reach the primary outcome compared to running a separate trial and without compromising the validity of the research or the ability to recruit to the trial and report the outcomes. The methodological and practical issues are presented, describing how they were addressed to ensure the amendment was a success.

methodsFLAIR was designed as a two-arm trial requiring 754 patients. In stage 2, two new arms were added: a new experimental arm and a second control arm to protect the trial in case of a change in practice. In stage 3, the original experimental arm was closed as its planned recruitment target was reached. In total, 1516 participants will be randomised to the trial.

resultsThe changes to the protocol and randomisation to add and stop arms were made seamlessly without pausing recruitment. The statistical considerations to ensure the results for the original and new hypotheses are unbiased were approved following peer review by oversight committees, Cancer Research UK, ethical and regulatory committees and pharmaceutical partners. These included the use of concurrent comparators in case of any stage effect, appropriate control of the type I error rate and consideration of analysis methods across trial stages. The operational aspects of successfully implementing the amendments are described, including gaining approvals and additional funding, data management requirements and implementation at centres.

conclusionsFLAIR is an exemplar of how an emerging experimental therapy can be assessed within an existing trial structure without compromising the conduct, reporting or validity of the trial. This strategy offered considerable resource savings and allowed the new experimental therapy to be assessed within a confirmatory trial in the UK years earlier than would have otherwise been possible. Despite the clear efficiencies, treatment arms are rarely added to ongoing trials in practice. This paper demonstrates how this strategy is acceptable, feasible and beneficial to patients and the wider research community.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN01844152 . Registered on August 08, 2014.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellPharmaceutical PreparationsAdaptive Clinical Trials as TopicClinical ProtocolsData ManagementHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignPharmaceutical PreparationsAdding treatment armsChronic lymphocytic leukaemiaComplex innovative designConfirmatory hypothesesFlexible designMulti-arm clinical trialPlatform trialRandomised controlled trialStatistical methodologyTrial management

Identifiers

PMID33419469
PMCPMC7792072
OpenAlexW3120510379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.