Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419456›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2021

Knowledge translation tools to guide care of non-intubated patients with acute respiratory illness during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

David Leasa, Paul Cameron, Kimia Honarmand, Tina Mele, Karen J Bosma, LHSC Ventilation Strategy for COVID-19 Working Group

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David LeasaLondon Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada.
Paul CameronLondon Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada.
Kimia HonarmandLondon Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada.
Tina MeleLondon Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada.
Karen J BosmaLondon Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada. KarenJ.Bosma@lhsc.on.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0423-7286
LHSC Ventilation Strategy for COVID-19 Working Group
Western University · CALondon Health Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing optimal care to patients with acute respiratory illness while preventing hospital transmission of COVID-19 is of paramount importance during the pandemic; the challenge lies in achieving both goals simultaneously. Controversy exists regarding the role of early intubation versus use of non-invasive respiratory support measures to avoid intubation. This review summarizes available evidence and provides a clinical decision algorithm with risk mitigation techniques to guide clinicians in care of the hypoxemic, non-intubated, patient during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although aerosolization of droplets may occur with aerosol-generating medical procedures (AGMP), including high flow nasal oxygen and non-invasive ventilation, the risk of using these AGMP is outweighed by the benefit in carefully selected patients, particularly if care is taken to mitigate risk of viral transmission. Non-invasive support measures should not be denied for conditions where previously proven effective and may be used even while there is suspicion of COVID-19 infection. Patients with de novo acute respiratory illness with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 may also benefit. These techniques may improve oxygenation sufficiently to allow some patients to avoid intubation; however, patients must be carefully monitored for signs of increased work of breathing. Patients showing signs of clinical deterioration or high work of breathing not alleviated by non-invasive support should proceed promptly to intubation and invasive lung protective ventilation strategy. With adherence to these principles, risk of viral spread can be minimized.

Indexed as

COVID-19Noninvasive VentilationAlgorithmsClinical Decision-MakingCritical CareHumansRespiratory Distress SyndromeCOVID-19High flow nasal oxygenNon-invasive ventilationProne positioningROX index

Identifiers

PMID33419456
PMCPMC7791165
OpenAlexW3120420078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.