Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419433›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2021

An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics.

Fei Zhao, Ya-Ping Chen, Yasaman Salmaki, Bryan T Drew, Trevor C Wilson, Anne-Cathrine Scheen, Ferhat Celep, Christian Bräuchler, Mika Bendiksby, Qiang Wang and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
87.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 280 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. PhytoKeys · 2026
    Article
  9. Chromosome-level genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  10. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  11. The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Molecular Diversification of the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Endocarp Morphology ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Fei ZhaoCAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.
Ya-Ping ChenCAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.
Yasaman SalmakiCenter of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, Department of Plant Science, College of Science, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran.
Bryan T DrewDepartment of Biology, University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, NE, 68849, USA.
Trevor C WilsonNational Herbarium of New South Wales, Australian Institute of Botanical Science, Royal Botanic Gardens & Domain Trust, Sydney, Australia.
Anne-Cathrine ScheenMuseum of Archaeology, University of Stavanger, NO-4036, Stavanger, Norway.
Ferhat CelepDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey.
Christian BräuchlerDepartment of Botany, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010, Wien, Austria.
Mika BendiksbyNTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Qiang WangState Key Laboratory of Systematic & Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinense Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing, 100093, China.
Dao-Zhang MinResearch Centre of Ecological Sciences, College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, China.
Hua PengCAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China.
Richard G OlmsteadDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bo LiResearch Centre of Ecological Sciences, College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, China. hanbolijx@163.com.
Chun-Lei XiangCAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, China. xiangchunlei@mail.kib.ac.cn.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNJiangxi Agricultural University · CNKunming Institute of Botany · CNInstitute of Botany · CNNatural History Museum Vienna · ATNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NORoyal Botanic Garden Sydney · AUStavanger Museum · NOUniversity of Nebraska at Kearney · USUniversity of Tehran · IRUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Australian Biological Resources Study National Taxonomy Research Grant Program RG19-17Postdoctoral Research Program TUBITAK-BIDEB 2219Ten Thousand Talents Program of Yunnan YNWR-QNBJ-2018-279Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects 2019FI009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA robust molecular phylogeny is fundamental for developing a stable classification and providing a solid framework to understand patterns of diversification, historical biogeography, and character evolution. As the sixth largest angiosperm family, Lamiaceae, or the mint family, consitutes a major source of aromatic oil, wood, ornamentals, and culinary and medicinal herbs, making it an exceptionally important group ecologically, ethnobotanically, and floristically. The lack of a reliable phylogenetic framework for this family has thus far hindered broad-scale biogeographic studies and our comprehension of diversification. Although significant progress has been made towards clarifying Lamiaceae relationships during the past three decades, the resolution of a phylogenetic backbone at the tribal level has remained one of the greatest challenges due to limited availability of genetic data.

resultsWe performed phylogenetic analyses of Lamiaceae to infer relationships at the tribal level using 79 protein-coding plastid genes from 175 accessions representing 170 taxa, 79 genera, and all 12 subfamilies. Both maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses yielded a more robust phylogenetic hypothesis relative to previous studies and supported the monophyly of all 12 subfamilies, and a classification for 22 tribes, three of which are newly recognized in this study. As a consequence, we propose an updated phylogenetically informed tribal classification for Lamiaceae that is supplemented with a detailed summary of taxonomic history, generic and species diversity, morphology, synapomorphies, and distribution for each subfamily and tribe.

conclusionsIncreased taxon sampling conjoined with phylogenetic analyses based on plastome sequences has provided robust support at both deep and shallow nodes and offers new insights into the phylogenetic relationships among tribes and subfamilies of Lamiaceae. This robust phylogenetic backbone of Lamiaceae will serve as a framework for future studies on mint classification, biogeography, character evolution, and diversification.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, PlantPhylogenyLamiaceaePlastidsLamiaceaeLamioideaeMintsPhylogenomicsTribal relationships

Identifiers

PMID33419433
PMCPMC7796571
OpenAlexW3119845653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.