Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419429›Full record

ReviewBMC veterinary research2021

Impact of selected environmental factors on microbiome of the digestive tract of ruminants.

Paulina Cholewińska, Wanda Górniak, Konrad Wojnarowski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC veterinary research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paulina CholewińskaInstitute of Animal Breeding, Wrocław University of Enviromental and Life Sciences, Chełmońskiego 38C, 51-630, Wrocław, Poland. paulina.cholewinska@upwr.edu.pl.
Wanda GórniakDepartment of Environment Hygiene and Animal Welfare, Wrocław University of Enviromental and Life Sciences, Chełmońskiego 38C, 51-630, Wrocław, Poland.
Konrad WojnarowskiInstitute of Animal Breeding, Wrocław University of Enviromental and Life Sciences, Chełmońskiego 38C, 51-630, Wrocław, Poland.
Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruminants are an important part of world animal production. The main factors affecting their production rates are age, diet, physiological condition and welfare. Disorders related to low level of welfare can significantly affect the microbiological composition of the digestive system, which is essential to maintain high production rates. The microbiology of the ruminant gastrointestinal tract may be significantly affected by inappropriate keeping system (especially in juveniles), psychological stress (e.g. transport), or heat stress. This results in an increased risk of metabolic diseases, reduced fertility and systemic diseases. Therefore, the paper focuses on selected disorders i.e., aforementioned inappropriate maintenance system, psychological stress, heat stress and their effects on the microbiome of the digestive system.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsAnimal WelfareDietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHeat-Shock ResponseRuminantsStress, PsychologicalDigestive tractHeat stressKeeping systemMicrofloraPsychological stressRuminant productivity

Identifiers

PMID33419429
PMCPMC7796543
OpenAlexW3119653860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.