Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419398›Full record

SynthesisBMC family practice2021

Effects of the scope of practice on family physicians: a systematic review.

Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Isabelle Samson, Jasmine Sawadogo, José Massougbodji, Amédé Gogovor, Ella Diendéré, Frédéric Turgeon, France Légaré

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Courage to Shape Our Future.Family medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Family Physicians Working at Hospitals: A 20-Year Nationwide Trend Analysis in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hervé Tchala Vignon ZomahounVITAM, Research Center in Sustainable Health, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada. herve.zomahoun.ciussscn@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.
Isabelle SamsonDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, QC, Canada.
Jasmine SawadogoFirst Nations of Quebec and Labrador Health and Social Services Commission, Québec, Canada.
José MassougbodjiVITAM, Research Center in Sustainable Health, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Amédé GogovorVITAM, Research Center in Sustainable Health, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Ella DiendéréVITAM, Research Center in Sustainable Health, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Frédéric TurgeonQuebec College of Family Physicians, Laval, QC, Canada.
France LégaréVITAM, Research Center in Sustainable Health, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Funding

CIHR SU1-139759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily medicine is a branch of medicine that manages common and long-term illnesses in children and adults. Family physicians in particular play a major role and their scope of practice is expected to impact patient and population. However, little is known about its impact on physicians. We aimed to assess the effects of scope of practice on family physician outcomes.

methodsWe performed a systematic review that we reported using PRISMA guidelines. For the inclusion criteria, any study exploring an association between the scope of practice and physician outcomes was considered. Three bibliographic databases Medline, Embase, and ERIC were consulted through OVID interface from their respective inceptions to November, 2020. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of studies using appropriate tools. We conducted data synthesis using a narrative form. GRADE was used for evaluating quality of cumulative evidence.

resultsIn total, we included 12 studies with 38,732 participants from 6927 citations identified. Eleven of them were cross-sectional, and one was a cohort study with acceptable methodological quality. We found that: 1) family physicians with diverse clinical and nonclinical activities significantly improve their job satisfaction (p<0.05); 2) family physicians with a variety of clinical practices significantly improve their competences and health status (p<0.05); 3) family physicians who perform clinical procedures (mainly extended to gynecological procedures) significantly improve their psychosocial outcomes (e.g., job satisfaction) (p<0.05); and 4) some associations are not statistically significant (e.g., relation between variety of practice settings and outcomes). We observed that the evidence available has a very low level.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the scope of practice may be favorably associated with some family physician outcomes but with a very low level of evidence available. Based on these findings, healthcare system managers could monitor the scope of practice among family physicians and encourage future research in this field. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Our protocol was registered under the number CRD42019121990 in PROSPERO.

Indexed as

Physicians, FamilyScope of PracticeAdultChildCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareHumansFamily medicineFamily physicianScope of practiceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33419398
PMCPMC7796628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.