ReviewBMC ophthalmology2021
Orbital aspergillosis: a case report and review of the literature.
Review in BMC ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lacrimal sac Aspergillosis Masquerading as Malignancy: A Rare Case Report.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- Orbital aspergillosis in an immunocompromised man with no history of trauma: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
- Eye fungal infections: a mini review.Archives of microbiology · 2023Review
- Aspergillosis-induced osteomyelitis involving the maxillary sinus with multiple extraoral sinus - A rare case report.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
- Microvascular and Morphologic Changes of the Macula over Lifetime.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Necrotizing orbital infections: A comprehensive review.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrbital aspergillosis is a rare sight- and life-threatening fungal infection affecting immunocompromised or otherwise healthy patients. It is often misdiagnosed due to its unspecific clinical and radiologic appearance. Therapeutic delay can have dramatic consequences. However, progress in microbiological diagnostic techniques and therapeutic experience from case series help improve the management of this disease. CASE PRESENTATION: A 78-year-old immunocompetent woman presented at an eye clinic for subacute swelling, reddening, and ptosis of her left upper eyelid. Based on radiologic and histologic considerations, she was treated for idiopathic orbital inflammation, but her condition worsened. After a second biopsy of the orbital mass, aspergillosis was diagnosed. Her condition improved promptly after initiation of an oral voriconazole treatment. Additionally, using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, A. fumigatus was identified on tissue of both biopsies and its azole susceptibility was examined simultaneously.
conclusionsIn the case described here, oral antifungal treatment was sufficient for the therapy of invasive orbital aspergillosis. Performing fungal PCR on orbital tissue can accelerate the diagnostic process and should be performed in ambiguous cases of slowly growing orbital mass. Finally, interdisciplinary management is the key to optimal treatment of orbital tumours and infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.