Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419236›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Animal Welfare and Meat Quality Assessment in Gas Stunning during Commercial Slaughter of Pigs Using Hypercapnic-Hypoxia (20% CO

Sophie Atkinson, Bo Algers, Joaquim Pallisera, Antonio Velarde, Pol Llonch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Effect of Stocking Density during COAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  3. The use of high expansion foam for stunning and killing pigs and poultry.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  4. COAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie AtkinsonDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, SLU, P.O. Box 234, 53223 Skara, Sweden.
Bo AlgersDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, SLU, P.O. Box 234, 53223 Skara, Sweden.
Joaquim PalliseraAnimal Welfare Program, IRTA, Veïnat de Síes, 17121 Girona, Spain.
Antonio VelardeAnimal Welfare Program, IRTA, Veïnat de Síes, 17121 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2634-3138
Pol LlonchAnimal Welfare Program, IRTA, Veïnat de Síes, 17121 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5958-861X
Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Swedish Board of Agriculture #1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed aversion, stunning effectiveness, and product quality of nitrogen and carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

animal welfarecarbon dioxidehypercapniahypercapnic-hypoxiameat qualitynitrogenpigsslaughterstunning

Identifiers

PMID33419236
PMCPMC7766013
OpenAlexW3116195556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.