Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419184›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Immunogenicity of Multiple Doses of pDNA Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.

Iman Almansour, Nabela Calamata Macadato, Thamer Alshammari

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05171946 (Phase-I, Single Center, Randomized, Dosage Finding Study, to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of a Prophylactic COVID-19 pDNA Vaccine After Multiple Ascending Doses in Healthy Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05171946 phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Phase-I, Single Center, Randomized, Dosage Finding Study, to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of a Prophylactic COVID-19 pDNA Vaccine After Multiple Ascending Doses in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorIman AlmansourRan2022 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsSafety, Vaccine Reaction, Vaccine Adverse Reaction, ImmunizationArmsS.opt.FL COVID-19 pDNA vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. hCoronavirusesDB: an integrated bioinformatics resource for human coronaviruses.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iman AlmansourDepartment of Epidemic Diseases Research, Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8193-9797
Nabela Calamata MacadatoDepartment of Epidemic Diseases Research, Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.
Thamer AlshammariDepartment of Epidemic Diseases Research, Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4007-1984
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SA

Funding

Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia IRMC-161-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its identification in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has resulted in 46 million cases and more than one million deaths worldwide, as of 30 October 2020. Limited data exist on the magnitude and durability of antibodies generated by natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 and whether they can provide long-lasting immunity from reinfection. Vaccination has proven the most effective measure for controlling and preventing pandemics and, thus, development of a vaccine against COVID-19 is a top priority. However, the doses required to induce effective, long-lasting antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 remain undetermined. Here, we present the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates encoding the viral spike (S) gene, generated using plasmid (p)DNA technology, and we demonstrate the eliciting of S-specific antibodies in mice after three and four doses. The magnitude of binding and neutralizing antibody responses with three doses of synthetic, codon-optimized, full-length S (S.opt.FL) vaccine is comparable to that generated after four doses, suggesting that three doses are sufficient to elicit robust immune responses. Conversely, four doses of S1.opt pDNA vaccine, containing the S globular head, are required to elicit high levels of neutralizing antibodies. Furthermore, the S.opt.FL pDNA vaccine induces the highest serum levels of interferon (IFN)-γ, a marker for activation of cellular immune responses. Overall, our data show that three doses of S.FL pDNA vaccine elicit potent neutralizing antibody responses, with preclinical data that support the immunogenicity of these COVID-19 vaccine candidates and provide justification for further translational studies.

Indexed as

antibodycoronavirusCOVID-19immunitypDNASARS-CoV-2vaccinevirus

Identifiers

PMID33419184
PMCPMC7825551
OpenAlexW3119865653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.