Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419147›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Carbon Ion Radiotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Yuhei Miyasaka, Shuichiro Komatsu, Takanori Abe, Nobuteru Kubo, Naoko Okano, Kei Shibuya, Katsuyuki Shirai, Hidemasa Kawamura, Jun-Ichi Saitoh, Takeshi Ebara and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Value of carbon-ion radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Cancers · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy?Cancer research and treatment · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yuhei MiyasakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5137-1862
Shuichiro KomatsuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Takanori AbeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1, Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama 350-1241, Japan.
Nobuteru KuboDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Naoko OkanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Kei ShibuyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Katsuyuki ShiraiDepartment of Radiology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Hidemasa KawamuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4899-1715
Jun-Ichi SaitohDepartment of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, 2630, Sugitani, Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Takeshi EbaraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kyorin University, 6-20-2, Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8611, Japan.
Tatsuya OhnoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6703-3144
Gunma University · JPJichi Medical University · JPKyorin University · JPSaitama Medical University · JPUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Radiotherapy is an essential treatment modality for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard treatment for early-stage NSCLC because of its favorable local control (LC) compared to conventional radiotherapy. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a kind of external beam radiotherapy characterized by a steeper dose distribution and higher biological effectiveness. Several prospective studies have shown favorable outcomes. However, there is no direct comparison study between CIRT and SBRT to determine their benefits in the management of early-stage NSCLC. Thus, we conducted a retrospective, single-institutional, and contemporaneous comparison study, including propensity score-adjusted analyses, to clarify the differences in oncologic outcomes. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 80.1% in CIRT and 71.6% in SBRT (

Indexed as

carbon ion radiotherapycomparisonnon-small cell lung canceroutcomesradiotherapystereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33419147
PMCPMC7825544
OpenAlexW3119122403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.