Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419136›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

An Automated Light Trap to Monitor Moths (Lepidoptera) Using Computer Vision-Based Tracking and Deep Learning.

Kim Bjerge, Jakob Bonde Nielsen, Martin Videbæk Sepstrup, Flemming Helsing-Nielsen, Toke Thomas Høye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Towards a standardized framework for AI-assisted, image-based monitoring of nocturnal insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Towards a toolkit for global insect biodiversity monitoring.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Towards global insect biomonitoring with frugal methods.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Real-Time Recognition and Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kim BjergeSchool of Engineering, Aarhus University, Finlandsgade 22, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6742-9504
Jakob Bonde NielsenSchool of Engineering, Aarhus University, Finlandsgade 22, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5898-2946
Martin Videbæk SepstrupSchool of Engineering, Aarhus University, Finlandsgade 22, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Flemming Helsing-NielsenNaturConsult, Skrænten 5, 9520 Skørping, Denmark.
Toke Thomas HøyeDepartment of Bioscience and Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Grenåvej 14, 8410 Rønde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5387-3284
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

Danish 15. Juni Fonden 2019-N-23.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect monitoring methods are typically very time-consuming and involve substantial investment in species identification following manual trapping in the field. Insect traps are often only serviced weekly, resulting in low temporal resolution of the monitoring data, which hampers the ecological interpretation. This paper presents a portable computer vision system capable of attracting and detecting live insects. More specifically, the paper proposes detection and classification of species by recording images of live individuals attracted to a light trap. An Automated Moth Trap (AMT) with multiple light sources and a camera was designed to attract and monitor live insects during twilight and night hours. A computer vision algorithm referred to as Moth Classification and Counting (MCC), based on deep learning analysis of the captured images, tracked and counted the number of insects and identified moth species. Observations over 48 nights resulted in the capture of more than 250,000 images with an average of 5675 images per night. A customized convolutional neural network was trained on 2000 labeled images of live moths represented by eight different classes, achieving a high validation F1-score of 0.93. The algorithm measured an average classification and tracking F1-score of 0.71 and a tracking detection rate of 0.79. Overall, the proposed computer vision system and algorithm showed promising results as a low-cost solution for non-destructive and automatic monitoring of moths.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMothsAnimalsComputersInsectaNeural Networks, ComputerbiodiversityCNNcomputer visiondeep learninginsectslight trapmothtracking

Identifiers

PMID33419136
PMCPMC7825571
OpenAlexW3120258623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.