Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33419033›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Organizational and Individual Outcomes of Health Promotion Strategies-A Review of Empirical Research.

Agata Basińska-Zych, Agnieszka Springer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Workplace Health Promotion in Germany for All? Results of the 2018 BIBB/BAuA survey of Employed People].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Health educationFrontiers in public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agata Basińska-ZychDepartment of Finance and Banking, WSB University in Poznań, 61-895 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7240-9516
Agnieszka SpringerDepartment of Finance and Banking, WSB University in Poznań, 61-895 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9181-2762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main purpose of the paper is to identify the outcomes for employers and employees indicated in research related to workplace health promotion interventions (WHPIs). We investigated what methods are used and what types of organization this type of research is most often carried out in. In addition, the authors attempted to assess to what extent the methods used in the previous research prove the effectiveness of the implemented WHPIs. A systematic review of English-language papers (2000-2020) focused on types of health-promoting interventions in the workplace, and outcomes for employers and employees were conducted using the SCOPUS database (

Indexed as

Health PromotionWorkplaceAbsenteeismEmpirical ResearchOrganizational Cultureeffectiveness evaluationenterpriseshealth promotionhealth promotion managementinterventionorganizational strategiesoutcomeswellbeingworkers’ healthworkplace

Identifiers

PMID33419033
PMCPMC7825322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.