Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33418998›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Understanding the Variation within a Dietary Guideline Index Score to Identify the Priority Food Group Targets for Improving Diet Quality across Population Subgroups.

Gilly A Hendrie, Greg Lyle, Chelsea E Mauch, Joyce Haddad, Rebecca K Golley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gilly A HendrieNutrition and Health Program, Health & Biosecurity, CSIRO, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Greg LyleSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Bentley Campus, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
Chelsea E MauchNutrition and Health Program, Health & Biosecurity, CSIRO, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1419-7417
Joyce HaddadNutrition and Health Program, Health & Biosecurity, CSIRO, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9774-3817
Rebecca K GolleyCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5197-7987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, population dietary intakes fall below the guideline recommendations and large-scale interventions have had modest success in improving diet quality. To inform the development of more targeted approaches, this study analysed the variations in self-reported data from an online survey of Australian adults collected between 2015 and 2020, to identify common combinations of low scoring components within a dietary guideline index. A low score was defined as meeting less than half the guideline recommendations (a score <50 out of 100). Among 230,575 adults, a single component analysis showed that 79.5% had a low score for discretionary choices, 72.2% for healthy fats and 70.8% for dairy. The combinations approach showed 83.0% of individuals had two to five low scoring components, with men, younger adults aged 18-30 years and individuals with obesity (BMI ≥ 30) more likely to have five or more. The most common dietary pattern combination included low scores for discretionary choices, dairy and healthy fats. There was a considerable but systematic variation in the low scoring components within the dietary patterns, suggesting that interventions with the flexibility to address particular combinations of key food groups across subgroups could be an effective and resource efficient way to improve diet quality in the population.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorNutrition PolicyAdolescentAdultAustraliaDietHumansMaleObesityYoung AdultAustraliadietary indexdietary patternsdiet qualityinterventionspopulation health

Identifiers

PMID33418998
PMCPMC7825319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.