ReviewClinical chemistry2021
Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: Evolving Approaches to Diagnosis and Risk-Stratification.
Review in Clinical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Oxygen Supply-Demand Imbalance and Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Secondary Analysis of the High-STEACS Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Risk factors for type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction.European heart journal · 2022Trial
- Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: Navigating Diagnostic Pathways and Therapeutic Crossroads Between Invasive and Conservative Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Sex-specific obesity paradox and type 2 myocardial infarction in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients.Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
- Myocardial injury in patients with acute ischemic stroke: Prevalence and types of triggers of myocardial demand ischemia.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- An easy-to-use model for screening type 2 myocardial infarction in geriatric patients with acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Elevated serum amylase concentrations are associated with worse in-hospital outcomes among patients with acute myocardial infarction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Type 2 myocardial infarction: challenges in diagnosis and treatment.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Application of the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction in Clinical Practice in Scotland and Sweden.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- The Development of a Chest-Pain Protocol for Women Presenting to the Emergency Department.CJC open · 2024Review
- Coronary Artery and Cardiac Disease in Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Cohort Study.Circulation · 2022Article
- Clinical and prognostic implications of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T concentrations in type 2 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
- Type 2 myocardial infarction: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in contemporary cardiology.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Correlation between Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndromes and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in Critically Ill Patients with Pulmonary Disease.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Cardiac Troponin Thresholds and Kinetics to Differentiate Myocardial Injury and Myocardial Infarction.Circulation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundType 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is frequently encountered in clinical practice and associated with adverse outcomes. CONTENT: T2MI occurs most frequently due to noncoronary etiologies that alter myocardial oxygen supply and/or demand. The diagnosis of T2MI is often confused with acute nonischemic myocardial injury, in part because of difficulties in delineating the nature of symptoms and misunderstandings about disease categorization. The use of objective features of myocardial ischemia using electrocardiographic (ECG) or imaging abnormalities may facilitate more precise T2MI diagnosis. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays allow rapid MI diagnosis and risk stratification, yet neither maximum nor delta values facilitate differentiation of T2MI from T1MI. Several investigational biomarkers have been evaluated for T2MI, but none have robust data. There is interest in evaluating risk profiles among patients with T2MI. Clinically, the magnitude of maximum and delta cTn values as well as the presence and magnitude of ischemia on ECG or imaging is used to indicate disease severity. Scoring systems such as GRACE, TIMI, and TARRACO have been evaluated, but all have limited to modest performance, with substantial variation in time intervals used for risk-assessment and endpoints used. SUMMARY: The diagnosis of T2MI requires biomarker evidence of acute myocardial injury and clear clinical evidence of acute myocardial ischemia without atherothrombosis. T2MIs are most often caused by noncoronary etiologies that alter myocardial oxygen supply and/or demand. They are increasingly encountered in clinical practice and associated with poor short- and long-term outcomes. Clinicians require novel biomarker or imaging approaches to facilitate diagnosis and risk-stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.