Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33418561›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model.

Alexander Ruesch, Deepshikha Acharya, Samantha Schmitt, Jason Yang, Matthew A Smith, Jana M Kainerstorfer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Candidate neuroinflammatory markers of cerebral autoregulation dysfunction in human acute brain injury.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Changes in neurovascular coupling with cerebral perfusion pressure indicate a link to cerebral autoregulation.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander RueschDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1890-4134
Deepshikha AcharyaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Samantha SchmittDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jason YangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Matthew A SmithDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-9942
Jana M KainerstorferDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Carnegie Mellon University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Non-invasive Intracranial Pressure Sensing with Near Infrared Light for Monitoring the Healthy and Diseased BrainR21EB024675 · NIBIB · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KAINERSTORFER, JANA MARIA · 2018 to 2020
$591k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB024675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain's ability to maintain cerebral blood flow approximately constant despite cerebral perfusion pressure changes is known as cerebral autoregulation (CA) and is governed by vasoconstriction and vasodilation. Cerebral perfusion pressure is defined as the pressure gradient between arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure. Measuring CA is a challenging task and has created a variety of evaluation methods, which are often categorized as static and dynamic CA assessments. Because CA is quantified as the performance of a regulatory system and no physical ground truth can be measured, conflicting results are reported. The conflict further arises from a lack of healthy volunteer data with respect to cerebral perfusion pressure measurements and the variety of diseases in which CA ability is impaired, including stroke, traumatic brain injury and hydrocephalus. To overcome these differences, we present a healthy non-human primate model in which we can control the ability to autoregulate blood flow through the type of anesthesia (isoflurane vs fentanyl). We show how three different assessment methods can be used to measure CA impairment, and how static and dynamic autoregulation compare under challenges in intracranial pressure and blood pressure. We reconstructed Lassen's curve for two groups of anesthesia, where only the fentanyl anesthetized group yielded the canonical shape. Cerebral perfusion pressure allowed for the best distinction between the fentanyl and isoflurane anesthetized groups. The autoregulatory response time to induced oscillations in intracranial pressure and blood pressure, measured as the phase lag between intracranial pressure and blood pressure, was able to determine autoregulatory impairment in agreement with static autoregulation. Static and dynamic CA both show impairment in high dose isoflurane anesthesia, while low isoflurane in combination with fentanyl anesthesia maintains CA, offering a repeatable animal model for CA studies.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsBlood PressureCerebrovascular CirculationFentanylHomeostasisIntracranial PressureIsofluraneModels, AnimalAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylIsoflurane

Identifiers

PMID33418561
PMCPMC7794034
OpenAlexW3118292101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.