ArticlePloS one2021
Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between continuous phenylephrine infusion and hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under remimazolam sedation: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation during major surgery in adults, including cardiac surgery: mechanisms, anesthetic impacts, and clinical applications.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Spinal cord vascular autoregulation: key concepts and opportunities to improve management.Spinal cord · 2026Review
- Associations of carotid flow velocity with cerebral perfusion and cerebral small vessel disease: a community-based prospective study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Monitoring of cerebral blood flow autoregulation: physiologic basis, measurement, and clinical implications.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Review
- Increased brain microvascular hemoglobin concentrations in children with cerebral malaria.Science translational medicine · 2023Article
- Candidate neuroinflammatory markers of cerebral autoregulation dysfunction in human acute brain injury.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023Review
- Contrast-enhanced subharmonic aided pressure estimation for assessment of intracranial pressure in vivo.Pediatric radiology · 2023Article
- Measuring brain beats: Cardiac-aligned fast functional magnetic resonance imaging signals.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Using near-infrared spectroscopy and a random forest regressor to estimate intracranial pressure.Neurophotonics · 2022Article
- Non-Invasive Spectroscopy for Measuring Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation and Metabolism as a Function of Cerebral Perfusion Pressure.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Changes in neurovascular coupling with cerebral perfusion pressure indicate a link to cerebral autoregulation.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022Article
- Real-Time Evaluation of Cerebral Autoregulation Based on Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Predict Clinical Outcome after Bypass Surgery in Moyamoya Disease.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Continuous Time-Domain Cerebrovascular Reactivity Metrics and Discriminate Capacity for the Upper and Lower Limits of Autoregulation: A Scoping Review of the Animal Literature.Neurotrauma reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The brain's ability to maintain cerebral blood flow approximately constant despite cerebral perfusion pressure changes is known as cerebral autoregulation (CA) and is governed by vasoconstriction and vasodilation. Cerebral perfusion pressure is defined as the pressure gradient between arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure. Measuring CA is a challenging task and has created a variety of evaluation methods, which are often categorized as static and dynamic CA assessments. Because CA is quantified as the performance of a regulatory system and no physical ground truth can be measured, conflicting results are reported. The conflict further arises from a lack of healthy volunteer data with respect to cerebral perfusion pressure measurements and the variety of diseases in which CA ability is impaired, including stroke, traumatic brain injury and hydrocephalus. To overcome these differences, we present a healthy non-human primate model in which we can control the ability to autoregulate blood flow through the type of anesthesia (isoflurane vs fentanyl). We show how three different assessment methods can be used to measure CA impairment, and how static and dynamic autoregulation compare under challenges in intracranial pressure and blood pressure. We reconstructed Lassen's curve for two groups of anesthesia, where only the fentanyl anesthetized group yielded the canonical shape. Cerebral perfusion pressure allowed for the best distinction between the fentanyl and isoflurane anesthetized groups. The autoregulatory response time to induced oscillations in intracranial pressure and blood pressure, measured as the phase lag between intracranial pressure and blood pressure, was able to determine autoregulatory impairment in agreement with static autoregulation. Static and dynamic CA both show impairment in high dose isoflurane anesthesia, while low isoflurane in combination with fentanyl anesthesia maintains CA, offering a repeatable animal model for CA studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.