SynthesisThe American journal of emergency medicine2021
Inflammatory and hematologic markers as predictors of severe outcomes in COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
128 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.
- Micronutrients, Vitamin D, and Inflammatory Biomarkers in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Causal Inference Studies.Nutrition reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of colchicine on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Annals of medicine · 2022Pooled it
- 17-Hydroxyprogesterone Response to Standard Dose Synacthen Stimulation Test inJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- The effectiveness of high-dose intravenous vitamin C for patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Complementary therapies in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Janus kinase (JAK)-inhibitors and coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Epilepsy and the risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 outcomes: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021Pooled it
- D-dimer, disease severity, and deaths (3D-study) in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 100 studies.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Delirium is a good predictor for poor outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.Journal of psychiatric research · 2021Pooled it
- Mortality and risk factors associated with pulmonary embolism in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Colchicine treatment can improve outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology · 2021Pooled it
- Multi-biomarker is an early-stage predictor for progression of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.International journal of medical sciences · 2021Pooled it
- Mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.General hospital psychiatryPooled it
- Randomized controlled trial of convalescent plasma therapy against standard therapy in patients with severe COVID-19 disease.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Myocardial Injury and Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Severe or Critical COVID-19: A Single-Center Observational Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Article
- The role of serum tryptase in COVID-19 pathogenesis and its value as a prognostic marker: a single-center prospective cohort study.Acta biochimica Polonica · 2026Article
- Determination and comparison of serum C-reactive protein levels in patients with Omicron and Delta strains of COVID-19 hospitalized in Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia, 2021.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The Clinical Significance of GRP78 in COVID-19 Pneumonia Across Two Regional Cohorts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The Role of Serial Monitoring of Laboratory Parameters in Determining the Need for Intensive Care in Severe COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Assessment of the Abnormalities in Chest Computed Tomography and Pulmonary Function Test in Convalescents Six Months After COVID-19.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaboratory testing is commonly performed in patients with COVID-19. Each of the laboratory parameters has potential value for risk stratification and prediction of COVID-19 outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the difference between these parameters in severe and nonsevere disease and to provide the optimal cutoff value for predicting severe disease.
methodWe performed a systematic literature search through electronic databases. The variables of interest were serum procalcitonin, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in each group of severity outcomes from COVID-19.
resultsThere were a total of 4848 patients from 23 studies. Our meta-analysis suggest that patients with severe COVID-19 infections have higher procalcitonin, (mean difference 0.07; 95% CI 0.05-0.10; p < 0.00001), CRP (mean difference 36.88; 95% CI 29.10-44.65; p < 0.00001), D-Dimer (mean difference 0.43; 95% CI 0.31-0.56; p < 0.00001), and LDH (mean difference 102.79; 95% CI 79.10-126.49; p < 0.00001) but lower levels of albumin (mean difference -4.58; 95% CI -5.76 to -3.39; p < 0.00001) than those with nonsevere COVID-19 infections. The cutoff values for the parameters were 0.065 ng/mL for procalcitonin, 38.85 g/L for albumin, 33.55 mg/L for CRP, 0.635 μ/L for D-dimer, and 263.5 U/L for LDH, each with high sensitivity and specificity.
conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests elevated procalcitonin, CRP, D-dimer, and LDH and decreased albumin can be used for predicting severe outcomes in COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.