Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33418149›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2021

"And we just have to keep going": Task shifting and the production of burnout among overdose response workers with lived experience.

Michelle Olding, Jade Boyd, Thomas Kerr, Ryan McNeil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle OldingBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, V6Z 1Y6, BC, Canada; Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jade BoydBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, V6Z 1Y6, BC, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Thomas KerrBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, V6Z 1Y6, BC, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ryan McNeilBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, V6Z 1Y6, BC, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States; Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States. Electronic address: ryan.mcneil@yale.edu.

Funding

An ethno-epidemiological study of the implementation and effectiveness of an innovative and comprehensive response to the opioid epidemicR01DA044181 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI Thomas Kerr, Ryan McNeil · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
CIHRNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overdose response programs in North America increasingly employ task shifting-shifting overdose response tasks to less specialized workers-to increase effectiveness and promote involvement of people with lived/living experience of drug use (PWLE). In Canada, task shifting has occurred through community-driven implementation of overdose response programs staffed primarily by PWLE. The implications of this task shifting on workers' well-being and service delivery has received little scholarly consideration, despite reports of widespread burnout among frontline responders. This study examines experiences and drivers of burnout among PWLE working at low-barrier supervised consumption sites ("Overdose Prevention Sites" or OPSs) in Vancouver, Canada. Between December 2016 and March 2020, we conducted ethnographic fieldwork at four OPSs, including in-depth interviews with 23 overdose response workers, three site-based focus groups with 20 additional workers, and 150 h of naturalistic observation. Data were analyzed to explore how working conditions, labour arrangements, economic insecurity and social disadvantage shaped burnout. We found that overdose response workers commonly reported burnout, which they attributed to the precarious and demanding nature of their work. While casual positions offered low-barrier employment, PWLE often lacked the wages and benefits enjoyed by other frontline workers, with limited supports and opportunities for advancement. Due to their social position within drug-using networks, PWLE's work encompassed hidden care work that participants felt was constant and undervalued. The scarcity of permanent full-time positions, alongside barriers to transitioning into formal employment, prevented many PWLE from earning livable wages or taking time off to 'recharge.' This study highlights how the devaluing and casualization of overdose response labour, compounded by other dimensions of structural vulnerability, are central to burnout among overdose response workers with lived experience. Interventions to address burnout within this setting must extend beyond individual-level interventions (e.g. counselling, self-care) to also strengthen working conditions and economic security of PWLE.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalDrug OverdoseSubstance-Related DisordersCanadaHumansNorth AmericaBurnoutEthnographyHarm reductionOpioid overdosePeer workersQualitative researchStructural vulnerabilityTask shifting

Identifiers

PMID33418149
PMCPMC8168663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.