Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33417964›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2021

A Brief Intervention to Support Implementation of Telerehabilitation by Community Rehabilitation Services During COVID-19: A Feasibility Study.

Narelle S Cox, Katharine Scrivener, Anne E Holland, Laura Jolliffe, Alison Wighton, Sean Nelson, Laura McCredie, Natasha A Lannin

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patients and Physical Therapists' Experiences.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Narelle S CoxDepartment of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne, Australia.
Katharine ScrivenerDepartment of Health Professions, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Anne E HollandDepartment of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne, Australia; Alfred Health (Physiotherapy), Melbourne, Australia.
Laura JolliffeDepartment of Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Alfred Health (Occupational Therapy), Melbourne, Australia.
Alison WightonConcentric Rehabilitation Centre, Sydney, Australia.
Sean NelsonBenchmark Physiotherapy, Gardeners Road Physiotherapy and Sports Injury Centre, Sydney, Australia.
Laura McCredieConcentric Rehabilitation Centre, Sydney, Australia.
Natasha A LanninDepartment of Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Alfred Health (Occupational Therapy), Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: natasha.lannin@monash.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated adoption of telerehabilitation in services where face-to-face consultations were previously standard. We aimed to understand barriers to implementing a telerehabilitation clinical service and design a behavior support strategy for clinicians to implement telerehabilitation. A hybrid implementation study design included pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, identification of key barriers to implementation using the theoretical domains framework, and development of a targeted intervention. Thirty-one clinicians completed baseline questionnaires identifying key barriers to the implementation of telerehabilitation. Barriers were associated with behavior domains of knowledge, environment, social influences, and beliefs. A 6-week brief intervention focused on remote clinician support, and education was well received but achieved little change in perceived barriers to implementation. The brief intervention to support implementation of telerehabilitation during COVID-19 achieved clinical practice change, but barriers remain. Longer follow-up may determine the sustainability of a brief implementation strategy, but needs to consider pandemic-related stressors.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPandemicsCOVID-19Feasibility StudiesHumansSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTelerehabilitationImplementation scienceOccupational therapyPhysical therapistsRehabilitationTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID33417964
PMCPMC7981192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.