Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33417699›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2022

Dose-response modeling in high-throughput cancer drug screenings: an end-to-end approach.

Wesley Tansey, Kathy Li, Haoran Zhang, Scott W Linderman, Raul Rabadan, David M Blei, Chris H Wiggins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wesley TanseyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NewYork, NY, USA.
Kathy LiData Science Institute, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA and Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Haoran ZhangApplied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Scott W LindermanData Science Institute, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA and Department of Statistics, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Raul RabadanDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
David M BleiData Science Institute, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA, Department of Statistics, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA and Department of Statistics, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Chris H WigginsData Science Institute, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA, Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA and Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USApplied Mathematics (United States) · USColumbia University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Genetic neuroscience: How human genes and alleles shape neuronal phenotypesU01MH115727 · NIMH · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI ARLOTTA, PAOLA, BABADI, MEHRTASH · 2017 to 2021
$20.8M
Topology of Cancer Evolution and HeterogeneityU54CA193313 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI IAVARONE, ANTONIO, RABADAN, RAUL · 2015 to 2020
$10.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U54 CA193313NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH115727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized cancer treatments based on the molecular profile of a patient's tumor are an emerging and exciting class of treatments in oncology. As genomic tumor profiling is becoming more common, targeted treatments for specific molecular alterations are gaining traction. To discover new potential therapeutics that may apply to broad classes of tumors matching some molecular pattern, experimentalists and pharmacologists rely on high-throughput, in vitro screens of many compounds against many different cell lines. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian model of how cancer cell lines respond to drugs in these experiments and develop a method for fitting the model to real-world high-throughput screening data. Through a case study, the model is shown to capture nontrivial associations between molecular features and drug response, such as requiring both wild type TP53 and overexpression of MDM2 to be sensitive to Nutlin-3(a). In quantitative benchmarks, the model outperforms a standard approach in biology, with $\approx20\%$ lower predictive error on held out data. When combined with a conditional randomization testing procedure, the model discovers markers of therapeutic response that recapitulate known biology and suggest new avenues for investigation. All code for the article is publicly available at https://github.com/tansey/deep-dose-response.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsBayes TheoremDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEarly Detection of CancerHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansAntineoplastic AgentsDeep learningDose–response modelingDrug discoveryEmpirical BayesHigh-throughput screeningPersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID33417699
PMCPMC9007438
OpenAlexW3026075704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.