Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33417180›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2021

Application of principal component analysis for predicting body weight of Ethiopian indigenous chicken populations.

Fikrineh Negash

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fikrineh NegashAdami Tulu Agricultural Research Centre, P. O. Box 35, Batu, Ethiopia. fikrineh2010@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1170-1833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveUnder smallholder management conditions, where weighing scale is not readily available, body weight (BW) can be predicted from morphometric measurements using multiple regression. However, the statistical interpretation of the regression parameters estimated by least squares is difficult due to multicollinearity problems. Thus, principal component analysis (PCA) was used to predict BW from body measurements, including body length (BL), chest circumference (CC), shank length (SL), and shank circumference (SC) of Ethiopian indigenous chicken populations reared by smallholder farmers. The effectiveness of this technique was also compared with the traditional multiple regression analysis (MRA). MATERIALS AND

methodsMeasurements were taken from 134 male and 487 female chickens. The whole dataset was partitioned into two portions, namely, training and testing datasets, for model comparison and validation purposes. The training dataset, which consisted of 75% of the dataset, was used to develop the model, and the testing dataset, which consisted of 25% of the dataset, was used to validate the model.

resultsThe PCA results revealed that the variables for body measurements were represented by PC1 and PC2 in male birds and PC1, PC2, and PC3 in female birds. Regression models developed using scores derived from these PCs explained 88 and 69% of total variation in BW in male and female birds, respectively. Compared with traditional MRA, regression models generated using the PCA procedure were more accurate in predicting BW.

conclusionThus, the results of the present study could not only be used for predicting BW of Ethiopian indigenous chickens but also in their genetic selection programs.

Indexed as

Body WeightAnimalsChickensFemaleMaleMultivariate AnalysisPrincipal Component AnalysisBody measurementsComponent scoresEigenvaluesModel validationPrincipal componentsStepwise regression

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.