Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33417084›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental medicine2021

COVID-19: time to flatten the infodemic curve.

Anastasios Tentolouris, Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Panayotis K Vlachakis, Diamantis I Tsilimigras, Maria Gavriatopoulou, Meletios A Dimopoulos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Of mice and human-specific long noncoding RNAs.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned from more than a century of pandemics and current vaccine development for pandemic control.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anastasios TentolourisFirst Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5897-472X
Ioannis Ntanasis-StathopoulosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra General Hospital, 80 Vas. Sofias Avenue, 11528, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6328-9783
Panayotis K VlachakisDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra General Hospital, 80 Vas. Sofias Avenue, 11528, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-4942
Diamantis I TsilimigrasDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3676-9263
Maria GavriatopoulouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra General Hospital, 80 Vas. Sofias Avenue, 11528, Athens, Greece. mariagabria@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6244-1229
Meletios A DimopoulosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra General Hospital, 80 Vas. Sofias Avenue, 11528, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8990-3254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thousands of articles have been published regarding the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19). Most of them are not original research articles but reviews and editorials, and therefore, the absence of evidence-based guidelines has been evident. In parallel, the quality of manuscripts is questionable since the number of preprints has increased due to the need of fast publication of COVID-19-related articles. Furthermore, the number of retracted articles during the pandemic is exceptionally high. Media have an important role in the distribution of incorrect information, nevertheless individual people and policy makers are also responsible. As misinformation thrives in crisis periods, well-designed studies are needed to flatten the infodemic curve regarding prevention, diagnosis, and long-term complications of COVID-19.

Indexed as

CommunicationCOVID-19Peer Review, ResearchSARS-CoV-2Biomedical ResearchEditorial PoliciesEvidence-Based MedicineHumansSocial MediaCOVID-19InfodemicMisinformationSARS-CoV-2Social media

Identifiers

PMID33417084
PMCPMC7790724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.