Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33417078›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2021

Chemotherapy and Radiation-Associated Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction.

Alexandra E Teng, Benjamin Noor, Olujimi A Ajijola, Eric H Yang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fitness and metabolic response to exercise in young adult survivors of childhood lymphoma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  11. Long-Term Prognostic Value ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra E TengDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Benjamin NoorDepartment of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Olujimi A AjijolaUCLA Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 100 Medical Plaza, Suite 630, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Eric H YangUCLA Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 100 Medical Plaza, Suite 630, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. ehyang@mednet.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUCLA Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCardiovascular autonomic dysfunction (AD) among cancer survivors is increasingly being recognized. However, the mechanisms and incidence are poorly understood. In this review, the clinical features, diagnostic modalities, proposed mechanisms, and currently available treatments of cardiovascular AD in cancer survivors are described. RECENT

findingsMuch of our current understanding of cardiovascular AD is based on disease states such as diabetes, multisystem atrophy, and Parkinson's disease. Several non-invasive tests, measurements, and scoring systems have been developed as surrogates for autonomic function, with some even demonstrating associations with all-cause mortality. The mechanism of cardiovascular AD specifically in the cancer population, however, has not been directly studied. The etiology of cardiovascular AD in cancer survivors is likely multifactorial, and proposed mechanisms include direct nerve damage by chemoradiation, the pro-inflammatory state associated with malignancy, and paraneoplastic syndromes. It may also be that cardiovascular AD is an early marker of global cardiomyopathy rather than its own condition. Current pharmacologic options for cardiovascular AD are extrapolated from how it has been treated in other disease processes, and these agents have not been studied in the cancer population or compared head-to-head. Cardiovascular AD in cancer survivors can cause significant debilitation and may be associated with all-cause mortality. Current diagnostic modalities have several limitations, such as standardization and validity. However, given the nonspecific nature of cardiovascular AD, these tools provide an objective marker for diagnosis and tracking treatment response. While the mechanism of cardiovascular AD in cancer survivors has not been directly studied, it may be useful to evoke mechanisms of cardiovascular AD in other disease states such as diabetes, Parkinson's disease, and multisystem atrophy in addition to identifying unique conditions associated with malignancy like a pro-inflammatory state. Until further studies are performed, management of cardiovascular AD as seen in other disease states may serve as a guide for symptom management in cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAutonomic Nervous SystemAutonomic Nervous System DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesCardiovascular SystemHumansNeoplasmsRadiotherapyAutonomic dysfunctionAutonomic testingBaroreflexCardiologyCardio-oncologyChemoradiationChemotherapyDysautonomia cancer survivorshipHeart rate variabilityOncologyOrthostatic hypotensionParasympatheticPeripheral neuropathyPostural orthostatic tachycardiaPresyncopeRadiation therapySympatheticSyncopeTachycardiaTilt testValsalva

Identifiers

PMID33417078
OpenAlexW3118973145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.