Correlation of quality of life with instrumented analysis of a total knee arthroplasty series at the long-term follow-up.

purposeThe relationship between instrumented knee measurements and patient-reported outcome measures is a newer field that continues to evolve. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term quality of life (QoL) post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery correlating validated self-reported questionnaires, clinical examination and instrumented analysis, using baropodometry and accelerometry.

methodsThirty-six patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA between 1999 and 2006 were evaluated at 11.3 ± 2.3 years following surgery. Clinical examination included range of motion (ROM) and instrumented knee laxity measurements with the Rolimeter device. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain was also recorded. The utilised subjective outcome scores were the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the short form of World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF). Instrumented analysis was performed with baropodometry and accelerometry. QoL was assessed correlating clinical, subjective and instrumented results. Univariate analysis included the Spearman's Rho correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney tests.

resultsAt the long-term follow-up all patients had relatively high quality of life measurements, as well as functional scores, except for the Sport/Rec dimension of the KOOS score. Only cadence (p = 0.008) and velocity (p = 0.026) affected the WHOQOL psychology domain no matter the age, follow-up and gender of the patients. The domain was unaffected by VAS and Rolimeter measurements. WHOQOL Social domain was unaffected by all instrumentation measurements except for stance phase (p = 0.025), VAS (p = 0.005) and ROM (p = 0.028). KOOS physical domain was not affected by any parameter. KOOS pain was reversely affected by VAS (p = 0.004), KOOS symptom by ROM (p = 0.000 and median maximum pressure (p = 0.033).

conclusionQuality of life for the TKA patient can be correlated and assessed reliably with instrumented analysis using pedobarography and accelerometry, at the long-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.