Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33416992›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery: a case series.

Karina W Lo, David N Blitzer, Sami Shoucair, David M Lisle

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Robotic surgery (R-TAMIS): a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lymph node metastasis in T1-2 colorectal cancer: a population-based study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karina W LoDepartment of Surgery, MedStar Health Baltimore, 9000 Franklin Square Drive, Suite 2312, Baltimore, MD, 21237, USA. karinawailinlo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6155-8396
David N BlitzerDepartment of Surgery, MedStar Health Baltimore, 9000 Franklin Square Drive, Suite 2312, Baltimore, MD, 21237, USA.
Sami ShoucairDepartment of Surgery, MedStar Health Baltimore, 9000 Franklin Square Drive, Suite 2312, Baltimore, MD, 21237, USA.
David M LisleDepartment of Surgery, MedStar Health Baltimore, 9000 Franklin Square Drive, Suite 2312, Baltimore, MD, 21237, USA.
MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study describes the experience with robot-assisted transanal minimally invasive surgery (rTAMIS) at a single institution. TAMIS has become a popular minimally invasive technique for local excision of well-selected rectal lesions. rTAMIS has been proposed as another option as it improves the ergonomics of conventional laparoscopic techniques.

methodsRetrospective case series of patients with rectal lesions who underwent rTAMIS. Patient demographics, final pathology, surgical and admission details, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Successful procedures were defined as having negative margins on final pathology.

resultsA total of 16 patients underwent rTAMIS by a single surgeon between April 2018 and December 2019. Mean age of patients was 63 years. Final pathologies were negative for tumor (n = 4), tubulovillous adenoma (n = 4), tubulovillous adenoma with high-grade dysplasia (n = 4), and invasive rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 4). 43% were located in the middle rectum and 56% were located in the distal rectum. Mean maximum diameter was 4.1 cm (IQR 2-3.1 cm). Negative margins were seen in 100% of the excision cases, and 100% were intact. Mean operative time was 87 min (IQR 54.8-97.3 min), and median length of stay was 0 days (IQR 0-1 days). Postoperative complications included incontinence (n = 1) and abscess formation (n = 2). rTAMIS provided curative treatment for 12/16 patients, and the remaining 4 patients received the appropriate standard of care for their respective pathologies.

conclusionsRobot-assisted TAMIS is a safe alternative to laparoscopic TAMIS for resection of appropriate rectal polyps and early rectal cancers. rTAMIS may provide a modality for resecting larger or more proximal rectal lesions due to the wristed instruments and superior visualization with the robotic camera. Future studies should focus on comparing outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic TAMIS, and whether rTAMIS allows for the removal of larger, more complex lesions, which may save patients from a more morbid radical proctectomy.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryAnal CanalHumansMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLocal excisionMinimally invasiveRectal cancerRobotic surgeryTAMISTransanal

Identifiers

PMID33416992
OpenAlexW3119030262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.